Abstract
‘Coaching philosophy’ is a term frequently used in coaching research and everyday coaching discourse. However, it is a term that remains ill-defined and poorly conceptualised resulting in considerable misuse and misunderstanding. In addition instead of providing clarification, limited past studies and anecdotal literature have provided a confusion of rhetoric philosophy and ideological statements of intent instead of true philosophical underpinnings that guide a coach’s practice. The research conducted specifically in coaching tends to describe a philosophy as a set of beliefs and values (i.e. Schempp, McCullick & Busch, 2006; Nash, Sproule & Horton, 2008; Bennie & O’Connor, 2010; Collins & Barbour, 2011; Cushion, Ford & Williams, 2012). This research tends to use a singular approach usually written statements or interviews with coaches (i.e. Nash et al., 2008; Robbins, Houston & Dummer, 2010; Bennie & O’Connor, 2010; Collins & Barber, 2011; Camire, Trudel & Forneris, 2012). Research has therefore failed to see past simplistic coach descriptions and identify what a true coach philosophy consists of and how this underpins behaviour and practice. The current understanding therefore needs to be explored using empirical research to identify the true philosophical underpinning of what guides coaches’ actions. Researchers need to ask philosophical questions to identify what a coaching philosophy actually contains (Drew, 2000; Hardman & Jones, 2008). Therefore this research is looking at coaching philosophy through a philosophical lens using philosophical terms. Although there is a paradox on what a coaching philosophy actually consists of researchers (e.g. Voight & Carroll, 2006; Collins, Gould, Lauer & Yongchul, 2009; Careless & Douglas, 2011) still highlight that a philosophy underpins everything a coach does. Understanding coaching philosophy could be seen as the corner stone of coaching with it underpinning all coaches’ behaviour and practice. Therefore identifying what really underpins a coach’s philosophy through philosophical questions will help academics and coach education gain a more realistic understanding of a complex area of interest. The purpose of this study is to understand what a coaching philosophy consists of and how it is implemented and developed to help inform coach education in the development of coaches’ behaviour and practice.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - 22 Jun 2013 |
| Event | 2nd International Coaching Conference - Wychwood Park Conference Centre, Crewe, United Kingdom Duration: 22 Jun 2013 → 23 Jun 2013 |
Conference
| Conference | 2nd International Coaching Conference |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
| City | Crewe |
| Period | 22/06/13 → 23/06/13 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Coaching Philosophy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.-
Re-visiting a critical analysis of ‘coaching philosophy’: Deconstruction to reconstruction
PARTINGTON, M. & Cushion, C. J., 19 May 2025, In: Sport, Education and Society. p. 1-14 14 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (journal) › peer-review
Open AccessFile1 Link opens in a new tab Citation (Scopus)97 Downloads (Pure) -
A guide to understanding coaching philosophy: moving to a philosophy of coaching
PARTINGTON, M., 10 Dec 2019, Sports Coaching: A Theoretical and Practical Guide. Cope, E. & Partington, M. (eds.). 1 ed. Routledge, p. 9-17Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review
-
Coaching philosophy: an orthodox and symbolic device
PARTINGTON, M., 1 Dec 2018, Exploring Research in Sports Coaching and Pedagogy . Crosby, C. & Edwards, C. (eds.). Cambridge Scholars Publishing, p. 41-48Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review
Projects
- 1 Active
-
Changing coach behaviour and practice in English youth football
PARTINGTON, M. (PI)
1/09/08 → …
Project: Research
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver