You ≠ Me: Individual differences in the structure of social cognition

D.J Shaw, K Czekoova, C.R Pennington, Adam Qureshi, B Spilakova, M Salazar, M Brazdil, T Urbanek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study investigated the structure of social cognition, and how it is influenced by personality; specifically, how various socio-cognitive capabilities, and the pattern of inter-relationships and co-dependencies among them differ between divergent personality styles. To measure social cognition, a large non-clinical sample (n = 290) undertook an extensive battery of self-report and performance-based measures of visual perspective taking, imitative tendencies, affective empathy, interoceptive accuracy, emotion regulation, and state affectivity. These same individuals then completed the Personality Styles and Disorders Inventory. Latent profile analysis revealed two dissociable personality profiles that exhibited contrasting cognitive and affective dispositions, and multivariate analyses indicated further that these profiles differed on measures of social cognition; individuals characterised by a flexible and adaptive personality profile expressed higher action orientation (emotion regulation) compared to those showing more inflexible tendencies, along with better visual perspective taking, superior interoceptive accuracy, less imitative tendencies, and lower personal distress and negativity. These characteristics point towards more efficient self-other distinction, and to higher cognitive control more generally. Moreover, low-level cognitive mechanisms served to mediate other higher-level socio-emotional capabilities. Together, these findings elucidate the cognitive and affective underpinnings of individual differences in social behaviour, providing a data-driven model that should guide future research in this area.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-18
JournalPsychological Research
Early online date15 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 15 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

Individuality
Cognition
Personality
Emotions
Social Behavior
Personality Disorders
Self Report
Multivariate Analysis
Equipment and Supplies
Individual Differences
Social Cognition
Emotion Regulation
Personality Profile
Codependency (Psychology)

Cite this

Shaw, D. J., Czekoova, K., Pennington, C. R., Qureshi, A., Spilakova, B., Salazar, M., ... Urbanek, T. (2018). You ≠ Me: Individual differences in the structure of social cognition. Psychological Research, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1107-3
Shaw, D.J ; Czekoova, K ; Pennington, C.R ; Qureshi, Adam ; Spilakova, B ; Salazar, M ; Brazdil, M ; Urbanek, T. / You ≠ Me: Individual differences in the structure of social cognition. In: Psychological Research. 2018 ; pp. 1-18.
@article{6df5df38c7a14c1ba0c6a571d9babc70,
title = "You ≠ Me: Individual differences in the structure of social cognition",
abstract = "This study investigated the structure of social cognition, and how it is influenced by personality; specifically, how various socio-cognitive capabilities, and the pattern of inter-relationships and co-dependencies among them differ between divergent personality styles. To measure social cognition, a large non-clinical sample (n = 290) undertook an extensive battery of self-report and performance-based measures of visual perspective taking, imitative tendencies, affective empathy, interoceptive accuracy, emotion regulation, and state affectivity. These same individuals then completed the Personality Styles and Disorders Inventory. Latent profile analysis revealed two dissociable personality profiles that exhibited contrasting cognitive and affective dispositions, and multivariate analyses indicated further that these profiles differed on measures of social cognition; individuals characterised by a flexible and adaptive personality profile expressed higher action orientation (emotion regulation) compared to those showing more inflexible tendencies, along with better visual perspective taking, superior interoceptive accuracy, less imitative tendencies, and lower personal distress and negativity. These characteristics point towards more efficient self-other distinction, and to higher cognitive control more generally. Moreover, low-level cognitive mechanisms served to mediate other higher-level socio-emotional capabilities. Together, these findings elucidate the cognitive and affective underpinnings of individual differences in social behaviour, providing a data-driven model that should guide future research in this area.",
author = "D.J Shaw and K Czekoova and C.R Pennington and Adam Qureshi and B Spilakova and M Salazar and M Brazdil and T Urbanek",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1007/s00426-018-1107-3",
language = "English",
pages = "1--18",
journal = "Psychological Research",
issn = "0340-0727",
publisher = "springer",

}

Shaw, DJ, Czekoova, K, Pennington, CR, Qureshi, A, Spilakova, B, Salazar, M, Brazdil, M & Urbanek, T 2018, 'You ≠ Me: Individual differences in the structure of social cognition', Psychological Research, pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1107-3

You ≠ Me: Individual differences in the structure of social cognition. / Shaw, D.J; Czekoova, K; Pennington, C.R; Qureshi, Adam; Spilakova, B; Salazar, M; Brazdil, M; Urbanek, T.

In: Psychological Research, 15.10.2018, p. 1-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - You ≠ Me: Individual differences in the structure of social cognition

AU - Shaw, D.J

AU - Czekoova, K

AU - Pennington, C.R

AU - Qureshi, Adam

AU - Spilakova, B

AU - Salazar, M

AU - Brazdil, M

AU - Urbanek, T

PY - 2018/10/15

Y1 - 2018/10/15

N2 - This study investigated the structure of social cognition, and how it is influenced by personality; specifically, how various socio-cognitive capabilities, and the pattern of inter-relationships and co-dependencies among them differ between divergent personality styles. To measure social cognition, a large non-clinical sample (n = 290) undertook an extensive battery of self-report and performance-based measures of visual perspective taking, imitative tendencies, affective empathy, interoceptive accuracy, emotion regulation, and state affectivity. These same individuals then completed the Personality Styles and Disorders Inventory. Latent profile analysis revealed two dissociable personality profiles that exhibited contrasting cognitive and affective dispositions, and multivariate analyses indicated further that these profiles differed on measures of social cognition; individuals characterised by a flexible and adaptive personality profile expressed higher action orientation (emotion regulation) compared to those showing more inflexible tendencies, along with better visual perspective taking, superior interoceptive accuracy, less imitative tendencies, and lower personal distress and negativity. These characteristics point towards more efficient self-other distinction, and to higher cognitive control more generally. Moreover, low-level cognitive mechanisms served to mediate other higher-level socio-emotional capabilities. Together, these findings elucidate the cognitive and affective underpinnings of individual differences in social behaviour, providing a data-driven model that should guide future research in this area.

AB - This study investigated the structure of social cognition, and how it is influenced by personality; specifically, how various socio-cognitive capabilities, and the pattern of inter-relationships and co-dependencies among them differ between divergent personality styles. To measure social cognition, a large non-clinical sample (n = 290) undertook an extensive battery of self-report and performance-based measures of visual perspective taking, imitative tendencies, affective empathy, interoceptive accuracy, emotion regulation, and state affectivity. These same individuals then completed the Personality Styles and Disorders Inventory. Latent profile analysis revealed two dissociable personality profiles that exhibited contrasting cognitive and affective dispositions, and multivariate analyses indicated further that these profiles differed on measures of social cognition; individuals characterised by a flexible and adaptive personality profile expressed higher action orientation (emotion regulation) compared to those showing more inflexible tendencies, along with better visual perspective taking, superior interoceptive accuracy, less imitative tendencies, and lower personal distress and negativity. These characteristics point towards more efficient self-other distinction, and to higher cognitive control more generally. Moreover, low-level cognitive mechanisms served to mediate other higher-level socio-emotional capabilities. Together, these findings elucidate the cognitive and affective underpinnings of individual differences in social behaviour, providing a data-driven model that should guide future research in this area.

U2 - 10.1007/s00426-018-1107-3

DO - 10.1007/s00426-018-1107-3

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 18

JO - Psychological Research

JF - Psychological Research

SN - 0340-0727

ER -