'Women's agency and the fallacy of autonomy: the example of rape and sexual consent'

Paul Reynolds

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    34 Downloads (Pure)


    A principal cause of the disregard or demonization of women’s agency is the ‘functional fiction’ of autonomy. Whilst arguably a necessary means of attribution of causation and responsibility for human action, the concept of autonomy – sliced ‘thick’ or ‘thin’ – is characterised by a liberal individualism that eschews the complexity of women’s agency for an atomistic abstractive notion of individual volition and reason. As a result, attributions of victimhood or transgression have to be ‘inscribed’ onto women. Drawing on the example of rape and sexual consent, I will seek to argue that if we are to adequately understand and compose a notion of women’s agency that represents the choices, experiences and situatedness of women, it is necessary to recognise that an idea of ‘autonomy’ will not do. Instead, we need a notion of agency that sits dialectically between reason and affect, recognises the relationship between embodiment, discourse and the cultural, contextual and conjunctural constitution of a given space and moment of agency, and neither dilutes womanhood within a post-modern contingency nor reifies it to a defining category but recognises it as a presence that characterises how we see agency and how it is seen by the agent.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationWomen and Violence: The Agency of Victims and Perpetrators
    EditorsHeather Widdows, Herjeet Marway
    Place of PublicationLondon
    PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
    Number of pages0
    ISBN (Print)978-1-137-01511-2
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Publication series

    NameGenders and Sexualities in the Social Sciences


    Dive into the research topics of ''Women's agency and the fallacy of autonomy: the example of rape and sexual consent''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this