Abstract
Displays of eye movements may convey
information about cognitive processes but
require interpretation. We investigated
whether participants were able to
interpret displays of their own or other’s
eye movements. In Experiments 1 and 2
participants observed an image under
three different viewing instructions. Then
they were shown static or dynamic gaze
displays and had to judge whether it was
their own or someone else’s eye
movements and what instruction was
reflected. Participants were capable of
recognizing the instruction reflected in
their own and someone else’s gaze display.
Instruction recognition was better for
dynamic displays, and only this condition
yielded above chance performance in
recognizing the display as one’s own or
another person’s (Experiment 1 & 2).
Experiment 3 revealed that order
information in the gaze displays only
facilitated instruction recognition from
scanpaths where the same regions were
fixated, but fixation order distinguished the
task. Implications of these findings are
discussed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 220-252 |
Number of pages | 33 |
Journal | Cognitive Science |
Volume | 42 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 13 Mar 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2018 |
Keywords
- eye tracking
- eye movements
- gazeinterpretation
- gaze display
- gazerecognition
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What am I Looking at? Interpreting Dynamic and Static Gaze Displays'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Dr DAMIEN LITCHFIELD
- Psychology - Senior Lecturer in Psychology
- Health Research Institute
Person: Research institute member, Academic