Walking in my shoes: Imagined coordination’s effects on attitudes towards refugees. Psychological Studies.

GRAY ATHERTON, LIAM CROSS

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (journal)peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
136 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

People are prone to dividing others into the categories of ‘us’ and ‘them’. This can be particularly detrimental to minorities who may experience social exclusion, prejudice, and reduced access to equal opportunities. One method of improving intergroup relations is to create opportunities for contact. Common contact interventions have members of different groups meet and engage in conversation. There are also non-verbal embodied intergroup activities that produce the same effects. Previous work has shown that the pro-social effects of coordination may be linked to whether co-actors are classed as in or out-group members. The current study explored whether imagining walking in synchrony with inor out-group members changed majority members’ attitudes towards those individuals. Imagining walking in synchrony fostered greater increases in empathy and decreases in negative attitudes only towards minority group members following imagined coordination (not ingroups).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-9
JournalPsychological Studies
Early online date29 Sept 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Sept 2020

Keywords

  • Coordination
  • Entrainment
  • Synchrony
  • Attitudes
  • Pro-sociality
  • Group processes
  • Stereotypes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Walking in my shoes: Imagined coordination’s effects on attitudes towards refugees. Psychological Studies.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this