Validation and utilisation of a digital version of the Survey instrument for Natural history, Aetiology and Prevalence of Patellofemoral pain Studies (eSNAPPS)

Mohamed Yusuf, Paola Dey, Michael Callaghan, Nicola Relph, Phillip Gichuru, Susan Pinner, Jane Ashbrook, Joanne Ashman, Peter Goodwin, Ruth Macdonald, James Selfe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Abstract Objective This study validated the newly adapted electronic SNAPPS (eSNAPPS) against the original paper SNAPPS. Subsequently, the study estimated the prevalence of PFP in running participants and spectators attending three mass-participant running events in the United Kingdom by using the eSNAPPS tool. Design This study had two parts. Firstly, a validation of the original paper version of the SNAPPS tool. Secondly, if validation was achieved, eSNAPPS was used in a prevalence study. Participants A convenience sample of running participants and spectators aged 18-40 years attending the mass participation running events. Main outcome measure The 12-month prevalence of PFP. Results: eSNAPPS was valid in identifying those with PFP (ICC 0.99 for Overall agreement, p
Original languageEnglish
JournalPhysical Therapy in Sport
Early online date21 Apr 2021
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 21 Apr 2021

Keywords

  • Patellofemoral Pain
  • Knee pain
  • Epidemiology
  • Prevalence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation and utilisation of a digital version of the Survey instrument for Natural history, Aetiology and Prevalence of Patellofemoral pain Studies (eSNAPPS)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this