Untangling the Concept of Coercive Control: Theorizing Domestic Violent Crime

Jude Towers, Sylvia Walby*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (journal)peer-review

Abstract

The article assesses three approaches to domestic violence: two that use the concept of ‘coercive control’ and one that uses ‘domestic violent crime’. These are: Stark’s concept of coercive control; Johnson’s distinction between situational couple violence and intimate terrorism, in which coercive control is confined to the latter; and that of domestic violent crime, in which all physical violence is conceptualized as coercive and controlling.

The article assesses these three approaches on seven issues. It offers original analysis of data from the Crime Survey for England and Wales concerning variations in repetition and seriousness in domestic violent crime. It links escalation in domestic violent crime to variations in the economic resources of the victim. It concludes that the concept of domestic violent crime is preferable to that of coercive control when seeking to explain variations in domestic violence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7-28
Number of pages22
JournalCriminology and Criminal Justice
Volume18
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2018

Keywords

  • coercive control
  • crime survey
  • domestic violence
  • gender violence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Untangling the Concept of Coercive Control: Theorizing Domestic Violent Crime'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this