Understanding the Impacts of Online Mental Health Peer Support Forums: Realist Synthesis

Paul Marshall*, Millissa Booth, Matthew Coole, Lauren Fothergill, Zoe Glossop, Jade Haines, Andrew Harding, Rose Johnston, Steven Jones, Christopher Lodge, Karen Machin, Rachel Meacock, Kristi Nielson, JO-ANNE PUDDEPHATT, Tamara Rakic, Paul Rayson, Heather Robinson, Jo Rycroft-Malone, Nick Srhyane, Zoe SwithenbankSara Wise, Fiona Lobban

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (journal)peer-review

12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background:
Online forums are widely used for mental health peer support. However, evidence of their safety and effectiveness is mixed. Further research focused on articulating the contexts in which positive and negative impacts emerge from forum use is required to inform innovations in implementation.

Objective:
This study aimed to develop a realist program theory to explain the impacts of online mental health peer support forums on users.

Methods:
We conducted a realist synthesis of literature published between 2019 and 2023 and 18 stakeholder interviews with forum staff.

Results:
Synthesis of 102 evidence sources and 18 interviews produced an overarching program theory comprising 22 context-mechanism-outcome configurations. Findings indicate that users’ perceptions of psychological safety and the personal relevance of forum content are foundational to ongoing engagement. Safe and active forums that provide convenient access to information and advice can lead to improvements in mental health self-efficacy. Within the context of welcoming and nonjudgmental communities, users may benefit from the opportunity to explore personal difficulties with peers, experience reduced isolation and normalization of mental health experiences, and engage in mutual encouragement. The program theory highlights the vital role of moderators in creating facilitative online spaces, stimulating community engagement, and limiting access to distressing content. A key challenge for organizations that host mental health forums lies in balancing forum openness and anonymity with the need to enforce rules, such as restrictions on what users can discuss, to promote community safety.

Conclusions:
This is the first realist synthesis of online mental health peer support forums. The novel program theory highlights how successful implementation depends on establishing protocols for enhancing safety and strategies for maintaining user engagement to promote forum sustainability.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere55750
Pages (from-to)1-18
JournalJMIR Mental Health
Volume11
Early online date9 May 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 May 2024

Keywords

  • digital mental health
  • peer-to-peer support
  • social networking
  • moderation
  • systematic review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding the Impacts of Online Mental Health Peer Support Forums: Realist Synthesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this