Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Edge Hill University Home
Help & FAQ
Home
Profiles
Research units
Research output
Projects
Student theses
Activities
Prizes
Impacts
Equipment
Datasets
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
‘Turnitin said it wasn’t happy’: can the regulatory discourse of plagiarism detection operate as a change artefact for writing development?
C Penketh, Chris Beaumont
Computer Science
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article (journal)
›
peer-review
15
Citations (Scopus)
85
Downloads (Pure)
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '‘Turnitin said it wasn’t happy’: can the regulatory discourse of plagiarism detection operate as a change artefact for writing development?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Plagiarism Detection
100%
Writing Development
100%
Regulatory Discourse
100%
Turnitin
100%
Plagiarism Detection Tools
75%
Development Approach
50%
Assessment in Higher Education
50%
Higher Education
25%
Learning in Higher Education
25%
Undergraduate Degree
25%
UK Universities
25%
Developmental Model
25%
Malpractice
25%
Structural Organization
25%
Qualitative Responses
25%
Arts and Humanities
Discourse
100%
Plagiarism
100%
Writing Development
100%
Tutor
33%
Structure
16%
Departure
16%
Initiative
16%
Tension
16%
Under-graduate
16%
Social Sciences
Plagiarism Detection
100%
Legislation
16%
UK
16%
Focus Group
16%
Academic Teaching Personnel
16%
Good Practice
16%
Structural Organization
16%
Nursing and Health Professions
Tension
100%
Malpractice
100%
Psychology
Focus Group
100%