Third year student nurses' perceptions of the role and impact of Clinical Nurse Specialists: a multi-centred descriptive study

B. Jack, G. Hendry, A. Topping

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS) has experienced a rapid expansion in the number of clinical nurse specialist (CNS) posts in the last two decades. Despite this, there is limited robust evidence that evaluates the role and impact that the CNS makes. Furthermore there is reportedly considerable confusion and inconsistency surrounding the titles, descriptions, qualifications and grading of CNS posts. It is against this background the findings from this multi-centre descriptive survey are presented which explored final year ‘soon to be qualified' student nurses' perceptions of the CNS role and the impact they had on care delivery and other members of the nursing team. A specially designed self report instrument was distributed to 269 student nurses undertaking pre-registration adult branch nurse education at three higher education institutions in England and Scotland. A response rate of 82% (n=220) was obtained. The instrument contained a combination of open and closed questions. Quantitative data were analysed using SPSS (v 11.0) and a thematic approach as described by Miles and Huberman (1994) was used to categorise responses to the open ended items. The results indicate that the students had encountered clinical nurse specialists during their education. The students ranked CNS' in the fields of diabetes, palliative care and acute pain as the most frequent recipient of patient referrals. The students recognised the added value brought to patient care by involvement of a CNS in care delivery and valued the CNS as a source of knowledge and support to both themselves and other staff. Students also identified a number of disadvantages associated with the CNS role. These included role conflict and potential for deskilling nurses fulfilling a generalist role. This paper will discuss the findings and offer possible explanations for the results.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-46
JournalClinical Effectiveness in Nursing
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2004

Fingerprint

Nurse Clinicians
Nurse's Role
Students
Nurses
Education
Team Nursing
Confusion
National Health Programs
Acute Pain
Scotland
Palliative Care
England
Self Report
Patient Care
Referral and Consultation

Cite this

@article{34aef533aeb546b08a6e2e99699ece49,
title = "Third year student nurses' perceptions of the role and impact of Clinical Nurse Specialists: a multi-centred descriptive study",
abstract = "The United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS) has experienced a rapid expansion in the number of clinical nurse specialist (CNS) posts in the last two decades. Despite this, there is limited robust evidence that evaluates the role and impact that the CNS makes. Furthermore there is reportedly considerable confusion and inconsistency surrounding the titles, descriptions, qualifications and grading of CNS posts. It is against this background the findings from this multi-centre descriptive survey are presented which explored final year ‘soon to be qualified' student nurses' perceptions of the CNS role and the impact they had on care delivery and other members of the nursing team. A specially designed self report instrument was distributed to 269 student nurses undertaking pre-registration adult branch nurse education at three higher education institutions in England and Scotland. A response rate of 82{\%} (n=220) was obtained. The instrument contained a combination of open and closed questions. Quantitative data were analysed using SPSS (v 11.0) and a thematic approach as described by Miles and Huberman (1994) was used to categorise responses to the open ended items. The results indicate that the students had encountered clinical nurse specialists during their education. The students ranked CNS' in the fields of diabetes, palliative care and acute pain as the most frequent recipient of patient referrals. The students recognised the added value brought to patient care by involvement of a CNS in care delivery and valued the CNS as a source of knowledge and support to both themselves and other staff. Students also identified a number of disadvantages associated with the CNS role. These included role conflict and potential for deskilling nurses fulfilling a generalist role. This paper will discuss the findings and offer possible explanations for the results.",
author = "B. Jack and G. Hendry and A. Topping",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cein.2004.02.003",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "39--46",
journal = "Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing",
issn = "1361-9004",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Third year student nurses' perceptions of the role and impact of Clinical Nurse Specialists: a multi-centred descriptive study. / Jack, B.; Hendry, G.; Topping, A.

In: Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing, Vol. 8, No. 1, 01.03.2004, p. 39-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Third year student nurses' perceptions of the role and impact of Clinical Nurse Specialists: a multi-centred descriptive study

AU - Jack, B.

AU - Hendry, G.

AU - Topping, A.

PY - 2004/3/1

Y1 - 2004/3/1

N2 - The United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS) has experienced a rapid expansion in the number of clinical nurse specialist (CNS) posts in the last two decades. Despite this, there is limited robust evidence that evaluates the role and impact that the CNS makes. Furthermore there is reportedly considerable confusion and inconsistency surrounding the titles, descriptions, qualifications and grading of CNS posts. It is against this background the findings from this multi-centre descriptive survey are presented which explored final year ‘soon to be qualified' student nurses' perceptions of the CNS role and the impact they had on care delivery and other members of the nursing team. A specially designed self report instrument was distributed to 269 student nurses undertaking pre-registration adult branch nurse education at three higher education institutions in England and Scotland. A response rate of 82% (n=220) was obtained. The instrument contained a combination of open and closed questions. Quantitative data were analysed using SPSS (v 11.0) and a thematic approach as described by Miles and Huberman (1994) was used to categorise responses to the open ended items. The results indicate that the students had encountered clinical nurse specialists during their education. The students ranked CNS' in the fields of diabetes, palliative care and acute pain as the most frequent recipient of patient referrals. The students recognised the added value brought to patient care by involvement of a CNS in care delivery and valued the CNS as a source of knowledge and support to both themselves and other staff. Students also identified a number of disadvantages associated with the CNS role. These included role conflict and potential for deskilling nurses fulfilling a generalist role. This paper will discuss the findings and offer possible explanations for the results.

AB - The United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS) has experienced a rapid expansion in the number of clinical nurse specialist (CNS) posts in the last two decades. Despite this, there is limited robust evidence that evaluates the role and impact that the CNS makes. Furthermore there is reportedly considerable confusion and inconsistency surrounding the titles, descriptions, qualifications and grading of CNS posts. It is against this background the findings from this multi-centre descriptive survey are presented which explored final year ‘soon to be qualified' student nurses' perceptions of the CNS role and the impact they had on care delivery and other members of the nursing team. A specially designed self report instrument was distributed to 269 student nurses undertaking pre-registration adult branch nurse education at three higher education institutions in England and Scotland. A response rate of 82% (n=220) was obtained. The instrument contained a combination of open and closed questions. Quantitative data were analysed using SPSS (v 11.0) and a thematic approach as described by Miles and Huberman (1994) was used to categorise responses to the open ended items. The results indicate that the students had encountered clinical nurse specialists during their education. The students ranked CNS' in the fields of diabetes, palliative care and acute pain as the most frequent recipient of patient referrals. The students recognised the added value brought to patient care by involvement of a CNS in care delivery and valued the CNS as a source of knowledge and support to both themselves and other staff. Students also identified a number of disadvantages associated with the CNS role. These included role conflict and potential for deskilling nurses fulfilling a generalist role. This paper will discuss the findings and offer possible explanations for the results.

U2 - 10.1016/j.cein.2004.02.003

DO - 10.1016/j.cein.2004.02.003

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 39

EP - 46

JO - Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing

JF - Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing

SN - 1361-9004

IS - 1

ER -