The United Kingdom Field Epidemiology Training Programme: meeting programme objectives

MARIA PAOLA DEY, JEREMY BROWN, JOHN SANDARS, Yvonne Young, Ruth Ruggles, Samantha Bracebridge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction
Most evaluations of field epidemiology training programmes (FETP) are limited to process measures, but stakeholders may need evidence of impact.

Objective
To ascertain if the United Kingdom (UK) FETP met its objectives to: (i) strengthen capacity and provision of national epidemiology services, (ii) develop a network of highly skilled field epidemiologists with a shared sense of purpose working to common standards and (iii) raise the profile of field epidemiology through embedding it into everyday health protection practice.
Methods
The evaluation consisted of: (i) focus groups with training site staff, (ii) individual interviews with stakeholders and (iii) an online survey of FETP fellows and graduates. Findings were synthesised and triangulated across the three evaluation components to identify cross-cutting themes and subthemes.

Findings
Eight focus groups were undertaken with 38 staff, ten stakeholders were interviewed and 28 (76%) graduates and fellows responded to the survey. Three themes emerged: confidence, application and rigour. FETP was perceived to have contributed to the development, directly and indirectly, of a skilled workforce in field epidemiology, increasing stakeholders’ confidence in the service. Graduates applied their learning in practice, collaborating with a wide range of disciplines. Fellows and graduates demonstrated rigour by introducing innovations, supporting service improvements and helping supervisors maintain their skills and share good practice.

Conclusion
The UK FETP appears to have met its three key objectives, and also had wider organisational impact. FETPs should systematically and prospectively collect information on how they have influenced changes to field epidemiology practice.


Original languageEnglish
JournalEurosurveillance
Volume24
Early online date5 Sep 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

Epidemiology
Education
Focus Groups
United Kingdom
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Learning
Interviews
Health

Keywords

  • Programme Evaluation
  • qualitative research.
  • Public health surveillance
  • Education, Public Health Professional

Cite this

@article{d1dd4fbe447c450cb2d4976f0a702bc0,
title = "The United Kingdom Field Epidemiology Training Programme: meeting programme objectives",
abstract = "Introduction Most evaluations of field epidemiology training programmes (FETP) are limited to process measures, but stakeholders may need evidence of impact.Objective To ascertain if the United Kingdom (UK) FETP met its objectives to: (i) strengthen capacity and provision of national epidemiology services, (ii) develop a network of highly skilled field epidemiologists with a shared sense of purpose working to common standards and (iii) raise the profile of field epidemiology through embedding it into everyday health protection practice.Methods The evaluation consisted of: (i) focus groups with training site staff, (ii) individual interviews with stakeholders and (iii) an online survey of FETP fellows and graduates. Findings were synthesised and triangulated across the three evaluation components to identify cross-cutting themes and subthemes.Findings Eight focus groups were undertaken with 38 staff, ten stakeholders were interviewed and 28 (76{\%}) graduates and fellows responded to the survey. Three themes emerged: confidence, application and rigour. FETP was perceived to have contributed to the development, directly and indirectly, of a skilled workforce in field epidemiology, increasing stakeholders’ confidence in the service. Graduates applied their learning in practice, collaborating with a wide range of disciplines. Fellows and graduates demonstrated rigour by introducing innovations, supporting service improvements and helping supervisors maintain their skills and share good practice.Conclusion The UK FETP appears to have met its three key objectives, and also had wider organisational impact. FETPs should systematically and prospectively collect information on how they have influenced changes to field epidemiology practice.",
keywords = "Programme Evaluation, qualitative research., Public health surveillance, Education, Public Health Professional",
author = "DEY, {MARIA PAOLA} and JEREMY BROWN and JOHN SANDARS and Yvonne Young and Ruth Ruggles and Samantha Bracebridge",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "5",
doi = "10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.36.1900013",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
journal = "Eurosurveillance",
issn = "1560-7917",
publisher = "European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)",

}

The United Kingdom Field Epidemiology Training Programme: meeting programme objectives. / DEY, MARIA PAOLA; BROWN, JEREMY; SANDARS, JOHN; Young, Yvonne; Ruggles, Ruth; Bracebridge, Samantha.

In: Eurosurveillance, Vol. 24, 05.09.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The United Kingdom Field Epidemiology Training Programme: meeting programme objectives

AU - DEY, MARIA PAOLA

AU - BROWN, JEREMY

AU - SANDARS, JOHN

AU - Young, Yvonne

AU - Ruggles, Ruth

AU - Bracebridge, Samantha

PY - 2019/9/5

Y1 - 2019/9/5

N2 - Introduction Most evaluations of field epidemiology training programmes (FETP) are limited to process measures, but stakeholders may need evidence of impact.Objective To ascertain if the United Kingdom (UK) FETP met its objectives to: (i) strengthen capacity and provision of national epidemiology services, (ii) develop a network of highly skilled field epidemiologists with a shared sense of purpose working to common standards and (iii) raise the profile of field epidemiology through embedding it into everyday health protection practice.Methods The evaluation consisted of: (i) focus groups with training site staff, (ii) individual interviews with stakeholders and (iii) an online survey of FETP fellows and graduates. Findings were synthesised and triangulated across the three evaluation components to identify cross-cutting themes and subthemes.Findings Eight focus groups were undertaken with 38 staff, ten stakeholders were interviewed and 28 (76%) graduates and fellows responded to the survey. Three themes emerged: confidence, application and rigour. FETP was perceived to have contributed to the development, directly and indirectly, of a skilled workforce in field epidemiology, increasing stakeholders’ confidence in the service. Graduates applied their learning in practice, collaborating with a wide range of disciplines. Fellows and graduates demonstrated rigour by introducing innovations, supporting service improvements and helping supervisors maintain their skills and share good practice.Conclusion The UK FETP appears to have met its three key objectives, and also had wider organisational impact. FETPs should systematically and prospectively collect information on how they have influenced changes to field epidemiology practice.

AB - Introduction Most evaluations of field epidemiology training programmes (FETP) are limited to process measures, but stakeholders may need evidence of impact.Objective To ascertain if the United Kingdom (UK) FETP met its objectives to: (i) strengthen capacity and provision of national epidemiology services, (ii) develop a network of highly skilled field epidemiologists with a shared sense of purpose working to common standards and (iii) raise the profile of field epidemiology through embedding it into everyday health protection practice.Methods The evaluation consisted of: (i) focus groups with training site staff, (ii) individual interviews with stakeholders and (iii) an online survey of FETP fellows and graduates. Findings were synthesised and triangulated across the three evaluation components to identify cross-cutting themes and subthemes.Findings Eight focus groups were undertaken with 38 staff, ten stakeholders were interviewed and 28 (76%) graduates and fellows responded to the survey. Three themes emerged: confidence, application and rigour. FETP was perceived to have contributed to the development, directly and indirectly, of a skilled workforce in field epidemiology, increasing stakeholders’ confidence in the service. Graduates applied their learning in practice, collaborating with a wide range of disciplines. Fellows and graduates demonstrated rigour by introducing innovations, supporting service improvements and helping supervisors maintain their skills and share good practice.Conclusion The UK FETP appears to have met its three key objectives, and also had wider organisational impact. FETPs should systematically and prospectively collect information on how they have influenced changes to field epidemiology practice.

KW - Programme Evaluation

KW - qualitative research.

KW - Public health surveillance

KW - Education, Public Health Professional

U2 - 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.36.1900013

DO - 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.36.1900013

M3 - Article

VL - 24

JO - Eurosurveillance

JF - Eurosurveillance

SN - 1560-7917

ER -