The Roles of Action Selection and Actor Selection in Joint Task Settings

Motonori Yamaguchi, Helen Wall, Bernhard Hommel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Studies on joint task performance have proposed that co-acting individuals co-represent the shared task context, which implies that actors integrate their co-actor’s task components into their own task representation as if they were all their own task. This proposal has been supported by results of joint tasks in which each actor is assigned a single response where selecting a response is equivalent to selecting an actor. The present study used joint task switching, which has previously shown switch costs on trials following the actor’s own trial (intrapersonal switch costs) but not on trials that followed the co-actor’s trial (interpersonal switch costs), suggesting that there is no task co-representation. We examined whether interpersonal switch costs can be obtained when action selection and actor selection are confounded as in previous joint task studies. The present results confirmed this prediction, demonstrating that switch costs can occur within a single actor as well as between co-actors when there is only a single response per actor, but not when there are two responses per actor. These results indicate that task co-representation is not necessarily implied even when effects occur across co-acting individuals and that how the task is divided between co-actors plays an important role in determining how the actors represent the divided task components.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)184-192
JournalCognition
Volume182
Early online date16 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 16 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

joint tasks
Joints
Costs and Cost Analysis
costs
Task Performance and Analysis
performance

Keywords

  • Joint task switching
  • co-representation
  • division of labor
  • action representation
  • response selection

Cite this

Yamaguchi, Motonori ; Wall, Helen ; Hommel, Bernhard. / The Roles of Action Selection and Actor Selection in Joint Task Settings. In: Cognition. 2018 ; Vol. 182. pp. 184-192.
@article{59c4177d1ae14938bccb1837bbc44e3c,
title = "The Roles of Action Selection and Actor Selection in Joint Task Settings",
abstract = "Studies on joint task performance have proposed that co-acting individuals co-represent the shared task context, which implies that actors integrate their co-actor’s task components into their own task representation as if they were all their own task. This proposal has been supported by results of joint tasks in which each actor is assigned a single response where selecting a response is equivalent to selecting an actor. The present study used joint task switching, which has previously shown switch costs on trials following the actor’s own trial (intrapersonal switch costs) but not on trials that followed the co-actor’s trial (interpersonal switch costs), suggesting that there is no task co-representation. We examined whether interpersonal switch costs can be obtained when action selection and actor selection are confounded as in previous joint task studies. The present results confirmed this prediction, demonstrating that switch costs can occur within a single actor as well as between co-actors when there is only a single response per actor, but not when there are two responses per actor. These results indicate that task co-representation is not necessarily implied even when effects occur across co-acting individuals and that how the task is divided between co-actors plays an important role in determining how the actors represent the divided task components.",
keywords = "Joint task switching, co-representation, division of labor, action representation, response selection",
author = "Motonori Yamaguchi and Helen Wall and Bernhard Hommel",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.010",
language = "English",
volume = "182",
pages = "184--192",
journal = "Cognition",
issn = "0010-0277",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

The Roles of Action Selection and Actor Selection in Joint Task Settings. / Yamaguchi, Motonori; Wall, Helen; Hommel, Bernhard.

In: Cognition, Vol. 182, 16.10.2018, p. 184-192.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Roles of Action Selection and Actor Selection in Joint Task Settings

AU - Yamaguchi, Motonori

AU - Wall, Helen

AU - Hommel, Bernhard

PY - 2018/10/16

Y1 - 2018/10/16

N2 - Studies on joint task performance have proposed that co-acting individuals co-represent the shared task context, which implies that actors integrate their co-actor’s task components into their own task representation as if they were all their own task. This proposal has been supported by results of joint tasks in which each actor is assigned a single response where selecting a response is equivalent to selecting an actor. The present study used joint task switching, which has previously shown switch costs on trials following the actor’s own trial (intrapersonal switch costs) but not on trials that followed the co-actor’s trial (interpersonal switch costs), suggesting that there is no task co-representation. We examined whether interpersonal switch costs can be obtained when action selection and actor selection are confounded as in previous joint task studies. The present results confirmed this prediction, demonstrating that switch costs can occur within a single actor as well as between co-actors when there is only a single response per actor, but not when there are two responses per actor. These results indicate that task co-representation is not necessarily implied even when effects occur across co-acting individuals and that how the task is divided between co-actors plays an important role in determining how the actors represent the divided task components.

AB - Studies on joint task performance have proposed that co-acting individuals co-represent the shared task context, which implies that actors integrate their co-actor’s task components into their own task representation as if they were all their own task. This proposal has been supported by results of joint tasks in which each actor is assigned a single response where selecting a response is equivalent to selecting an actor. The present study used joint task switching, which has previously shown switch costs on trials following the actor’s own trial (intrapersonal switch costs) but not on trials that followed the co-actor’s trial (interpersonal switch costs), suggesting that there is no task co-representation. We examined whether interpersonal switch costs can be obtained when action selection and actor selection are confounded as in previous joint task studies. The present results confirmed this prediction, demonstrating that switch costs can occur within a single actor as well as between co-actors when there is only a single response per actor, but not when there are two responses per actor. These results indicate that task co-representation is not necessarily implied even when effects occur across co-acting individuals and that how the task is divided between co-actors plays an important role in determining how the actors represent the divided task components.

KW - Joint task switching

KW - co-representation

KW - division of labor

KW - action representation

KW - response selection

U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.010

DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.010

M3 - Article

VL - 182

SP - 184

EP - 192

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

SN - 0010-0277

ER -