The relationship between the golf-specific movement screen and golf performance.

Sophie Speariett, ROSS ARMSTRONG

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Context:
Golf requires effective movement patterns to produce an effective swing and performance.

Objectives:
The study aimed to determine the relationship between the Titleist Performance Institute golf specific functional movement screening (GSFMS) composite and individual element scores and golf performance by assessing a player’s handicap; clubhead speed; side accuracy; ball speed; peak pelvis rotation speed; swing sequence and common swing faults.

Design:
Cohort study, clinical measurement.

Setting:
English golf club.

Participants:
Eleven amateur golfers: 5 males (age: 37.2±18.7 years; height: 184.4±9.6cm; body mass: 89.5±13.4kg; handicap: 9±6.6) and 6 females (age: 53.7±15.0 years; height: 166.8±5.5cm; body mass: 67.9±16.6kg; handicap: 13±6.1).

Main outcome measures:
GSFMS composite and individual element scores and golf performance variables.

Results:
Significant relationships existed between GSFMS composite scores and handicap (r= -0.779, p=0.005); clubhead speed (r= 0.701, p=0.016); ball speed (r= 0.674, p=0.023); and peak pelvis rotation speed (r= 0.687, p=0.019). Significant relationships existed between 90°90° golf position and clubhead speed (r=0.716,p=0.013), ball speed (r=0.777,p=0.005), seated trunk rotation and peak pelvis rotation speed (r=0.606,p=0.048), single leg balance and handicap (r=-0.722,p=0.012), torso rotation and handicap (r=-0.637,p=0.039) and peak pelvis rotation speed (r=0.741,p=0.009). Single leg balance, overhead deep squat, and pelvic tilt were the GSFMS tests which participants had most difficulty in performing. The most common swing faults identified included loss of posture, slide, chicken winging and early hip extension.

Conclusions:
The GSFMS may be used to identify movement limitations that relate to golfing performance. These findings may potentially allow intervention to correct movement patterns and potentially improve golf performance.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages38
JournalJournal of Sport Rehabilitation
Early online date12 Mar 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Golf
Pelvis
Leg
Torso
Posture
Hip
Chickens
Cohort Studies

Keywords

  • clubhead speed
  • composite score
  • handicap
  • single leg balance
  • movement

Cite this

@article{b025d7280ed842f597bd3452dafe3f60,
title = "The relationship between the golf-specific movement screen and golf performance.",
abstract = "Context:Golf requires effective movement patterns to produce an effective swing and performance.Objectives:The study aimed to determine the relationship between the Titleist Performance Institute golf specific functional movement screening (GSFMS) composite and individual element scores and golf performance by assessing a player’s handicap; clubhead speed; side accuracy; ball speed; peak pelvis rotation speed; swing sequence and common swing faults.Design:Cohort study, clinical measurement.Setting:English golf club.Participants:Eleven amateur golfers: 5 males (age: 37.2±18.7 years; height: 184.4±9.6cm; body mass: 89.5±13.4kg; handicap: 9±6.6) and 6 females (age: 53.7±15.0 years; height: 166.8±5.5cm; body mass: 67.9±16.6kg; handicap: 13±6.1).Main outcome measures:GSFMS composite and individual element scores and golf performance variables.Results:Significant relationships existed between GSFMS composite scores and handicap (r= -0.779, p=0.005); clubhead speed (r= 0.701, p=0.016); ball speed (r= 0.674, p=0.023); and peak pelvis rotation speed (r= 0.687, p=0.019). Significant relationships existed between 90°90° golf position and clubhead speed (r=0.716,p=0.013), ball speed (r=0.777,p=0.005), seated trunk rotation and peak pelvis rotation speed (r=0.606,p=0.048), single leg balance and handicap (r=-0.722,p=0.012), torso rotation and handicap (r=-0.637,p=0.039) and peak pelvis rotation speed (r=0.741,p=0.009). Single leg balance, overhead deep squat, and pelvic tilt were the GSFMS tests which participants had most difficulty in performing. The most common swing faults identified included loss of posture, slide, chicken winging and early hip extension.Conclusions:The GSFMS may be used to identify movement limitations that relate to golfing performance. These findings may potentially allow intervention to correct movement patterns and potentially improve golf performance.",
keywords = "clubhead speed, composite score, handicap, single leg balance, movement",
author = "Sophie Speariett and ROSS ARMSTRONG",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "12",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2018-0441",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Sport Rehabilitation",
issn = "1056-6716",
publisher = "Human Kinetics Publishers",

}

The relationship between the golf-specific movement screen and golf performance. / Speariett, Sophie ; ARMSTRONG, ROSS.

In: Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 12.03.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The relationship between the golf-specific movement screen and golf performance.

AU - Speariett, Sophie

AU - ARMSTRONG, ROSS

PY - 2019/3/12

Y1 - 2019/3/12

N2 - Context:Golf requires effective movement patterns to produce an effective swing and performance.Objectives:The study aimed to determine the relationship between the Titleist Performance Institute golf specific functional movement screening (GSFMS) composite and individual element scores and golf performance by assessing a player’s handicap; clubhead speed; side accuracy; ball speed; peak pelvis rotation speed; swing sequence and common swing faults.Design:Cohort study, clinical measurement.Setting:English golf club.Participants:Eleven amateur golfers: 5 males (age: 37.2±18.7 years; height: 184.4±9.6cm; body mass: 89.5±13.4kg; handicap: 9±6.6) and 6 females (age: 53.7±15.0 years; height: 166.8±5.5cm; body mass: 67.9±16.6kg; handicap: 13±6.1).Main outcome measures:GSFMS composite and individual element scores and golf performance variables.Results:Significant relationships existed between GSFMS composite scores and handicap (r= -0.779, p=0.005); clubhead speed (r= 0.701, p=0.016); ball speed (r= 0.674, p=0.023); and peak pelvis rotation speed (r= 0.687, p=0.019). Significant relationships existed between 90°90° golf position and clubhead speed (r=0.716,p=0.013), ball speed (r=0.777,p=0.005), seated trunk rotation and peak pelvis rotation speed (r=0.606,p=0.048), single leg balance and handicap (r=-0.722,p=0.012), torso rotation and handicap (r=-0.637,p=0.039) and peak pelvis rotation speed (r=0.741,p=0.009). Single leg balance, overhead deep squat, and pelvic tilt were the GSFMS tests which participants had most difficulty in performing. The most common swing faults identified included loss of posture, slide, chicken winging and early hip extension.Conclusions:The GSFMS may be used to identify movement limitations that relate to golfing performance. These findings may potentially allow intervention to correct movement patterns and potentially improve golf performance.

AB - Context:Golf requires effective movement patterns to produce an effective swing and performance.Objectives:The study aimed to determine the relationship between the Titleist Performance Institute golf specific functional movement screening (GSFMS) composite and individual element scores and golf performance by assessing a player’s handicap; clubhead speed; side accuracy; ball speed; peak pelvis rotation speed; swing sequence and common swing faults.Design:Cohort study, clinical measurement.Setting:English golf club.Participants:Eleven amateur golfers: 5 males (age: 37.2±18.7 years; height: 184.4±9.6cm; body mass: 89.5±13.4kg; handicap: 9±6.6) and 6 females (age: 53.7±15.0 years; height: 166.8±5.5cm; body mass: 67.9±16.6kg; handicap: 13±6.1).Main outcome measures:GSFMS composite and individual element scores and golf performance variables.Results:Significant relationships existed between GSFMS composite scores and handicap (r= -0.779, p=0.005); clubhead speed (r= 0.701, p=0.016); ball speed (r= 0.674, p=0.023); and peak pelvis rotation speed (r= 0.687, p=0.019). Significant relationships existed between 90°90° golf position and clubhead speed (r=0.716,p=0.013), ball speed (r=0.777,p=0.005), seated trunk rotation and peak pelvis rotation speed (r=0.606,p=0.048), single leg balance and handicap (r=-0.722,p=0.012), torso rotation and handicap (r=-0.637,p=0.039) and peak pelvis rotation speed (r=0.741,p=0.009). Single leg balance, overhead deep squat, and pelvic tilt were the GSFMS tests which participants had most difficulty in performing. The most common swing faults identified included loss of posture, slide, chicken winging and early hip extension.Conclusions:The GSFMS may be used to identify movement limitations that relate to golfing performance. These findings may potentially allow intervention to correct movement patterns and potentially improve golf performance.

KW - clubhead speed

KW - composite score

KW - handicap

KW - single leg balance

KW - movement

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/relationship-between-golf-specific-movement-screen-golf-performance

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2018-0441

DO - https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2018-0441

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Sport Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Sport Rehabilitation

SN - 1056-6716

ER -