The Quiet Revolution? The Labour Party and Welfare Conditionality

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Labour’s 2017 general election manifesto contained a pledge to ‘end the punitive sanctions regime’ in the British welfare state. Whilst the specific implications of this pledge were not elaborated, such a policy would nevertheless constitute a profound break with a welfare consensus spanning over twenty years. The depth of the suggested changes on welfare are also evident in the scale of reform proposed to disability benefits, as well as plans – confirmed in August 2018 by the Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell – to pilot universal basic income. Collectively, these policies would seemingly be deeply at odds with public opinion on the benefits system, which over the course of the last two decades has significantly hardened. Yet despite the seemingly radical and controversial nature of the policy, it received very little media or public attention during the election campaign. This article explores Labour’s ‘quiet revolution’ on welfare, examining whether Labour’s new welfare approach is indeed a bold attempt to reshape public opinion on welfare or, alternatively, a mostly pragmatic reaction to changing social attitudes. The argument presented is that whilst there are persuasive explanations that Labour is responding to a change in the public mood, there is also evidence of a more ambitious goal at stake: the aim of reshaping, not simply responding to, public opinion on the welfare state.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-8
JournalThe Political Quarterly
Early online date23 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 23 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

Labour Party
welfare
public opinion
labor
welfare state
election manifesto
basic income
social attitude
election campaign
New Labour
sanction
mood
pragmatics
reform
evidence

Keywords

  • labour party
  • conditionality
  • welfare
  • social security

Cite this

@article{70076b5006cf4cc0b4589feb954ee471,
title = "The Quiet Revolution? The Labour Party and Welfare Conditionality",
abstract = "Labour’s 2017 general election manifesto contained a pledge to ‘end the punitive sanctions regime’ in the British welfare state. Whilst the specific implications of this pledge were not elaborated, such a policy would nevertheless constitute a profound break with a welfare consensus spanning over twenty years. The depth of the suggested changes on welfare are also evident in the scale of reform proposed to disability benefits, as well as plans – confirmed in August 2018 by the Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell – to pilot universal basic income. Collectively, these policies would seemingly be deeply at odds with public opinion on the benefits system, which over the course of the last two decades has significantly hardened. Yet despite the seemingly radical and controversial nature of the policy, it received very little media or public attention during the election campaign. This article explores Labour’s ‘quiet revolution’ on welfare, examining whether Labour’s new welfare approach is indeed a bold attempt to reshape public opinion on welfare or, alternatively, a mostly pragmatic reaction to changing social attitudes. The argument presented is that whilst there are persuasive explanations that Labour is responding to a change in the public mood, there is also evidence of a more ambitious goal at stake: the aim of reshaping, not simply responding to, public opinion on the welfare state.",
keywords = "labour party, conditionality, welfare, social security",
author = "Daniel Sage",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1111/1467-923X.12606",
language = "English",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Political Quarterly",
issn = "0032-3179",
publisher = "Sage",

}

The Quiet Revolution? The Labour Party and Welfare Conditionality. / Sage, Daniel.

In: The Political Quarterly, 23.10.2018, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Quiet Revolution? The Labour Party and Welfare Conditionality

AU - Sage, Daniel

PY - 2018/10/23

Y1 - 2018/10/23

N2 - Labour’s 2017 general election manifesto contained a pledge to ‘end the punitive sanctions regime’ in the British welfare state. Whilst the specific implications of this pledge were not elaborated, such a policy would nevertheless constitute a profound break with a welfare consensus spanning over twenty years. The depth of the suggested changes on welfare are also evident in the scale of reform proposed to disability benefits, as well as plans – confirmed in August 2018 by the Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell – to pilot universal basic income. Collectively, these policies would seemingly be deeply at odds with public opinion on the benefits system, which over the course of the last two decades has significantly hardened. Yet despite the seemingly radical and controversial nature of the policy, it received very little media or public attention during the election campaign. This article explores Labour’s ‘quiet revolution’ on welfare, examining whether Labour’s new welfare approach is indeed a bold attempt to reshape public opinion on welfare or, alternatively, a mostly pragmatic reaction to changing social attitudes. The argument presented is that whilst there are persuasive explanations that Labour is responding to a change in the public mood, there is also evidence of a more ambitious goal at stake: the aim of reshaping, not simply responding to, public opinion on the welfare state.

AB - Labour’s 2017 general election manifesto contained a pledge to ‘end the punitive sanctions regime’ in the British welfare state. Whilst the specific implications of this pledge were not elaborated, such a policy would nevertheless constitute a profound break with a welfare consensus spanning over twenty years. The depth of the suggested changes on welfare are also evident in the scale of reform proposed to disability benefits, as well as plans – confirmed in August 2018 by the Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell – to pilot universal basic income. Collectively, these policies would seemingly be deeply at odds with public opinion on the benefits system, which over the course of the last two decades has significantly hardened. Yet despite the seemingly radical and controversial nature of the policy, it received very little media or public attention during the election campaign. This article explores Labour’s ‘quiet revolution’ on welfare, examining whether Labour’s new welfare approach is indeed a bold attempt to reshape public opinion on welfare or, alternatively, a mostly pragmatic reaction to changing social attitudes. The argument presented is that whilst there are persuasive explanations that Labour is responding to a change in the public mood, there is also evidence of a more ambitious goal at stake: the aim of reshaping, not simply responding to, public opinion on the welfare state.

KW - labour party

KW - conditionality

KW - welfare

KW - social security

U2 - 10.1111/1467-923X.12606

DO - 10.1111/1467-923X.12606

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Political Quarterly

JF - Political Quarterly

SN - 0032-3179

ER -