Abstract

AimsThe aim of this audit was to assess and improve the completeness and accuracy of the National Joint Registry (NJR) dataset for arthroplasty of the elbow.MethodsIt was performed in two phases. In Phase 1, the completeness was assessed by comparing the NJR elbow dataset with the NHS England Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data between April 2012 and April 2020. In order to assess the accuracy of the data, the components of each arthroplasty recorded in the NJR were compared to the type of arthroplasty which was recorded. In Phase 2, a national collaborative audit was undertaken to evaluate the reasons for unmatched data, add missing arthroplasties, and evaluate the reasons for the recording of inaccurate arthroplasties and correct them.ResultsPhase 1 identified 5,539 arthroplasties in HES which did not match an arthroplasty on the NJR, and 448 inaccurate arthroplasties from 254 hospitals. Most mismatched procedures (3,960 procedures; 71%) were radial head arthroplasties (RHAs). In Phase 2, 142 NHS hospitals with 3,640 (66%) mismatched and 314 (69%) inaccurate arthroplasties volunteered to assess their records. A large proportion of the unmatched data (3,000 arthroplasties; 82%) were confirmed as being missing from the NJR. The overall rate of completeness of the NJR elbow dataset improved from 63% to 83% following phase 2, and the completeness of total elbow arthroplasty data improved to 93%. Missing RHAs had the biggest impact on the overall completeness, but through the audit the number of RHAs in the NJR nearly doubled and completeness increased from 35% to 70%. The accuracy of data was 94% and improved to 98% after correcting 212 of the 448 inaccurately recorded arthroplasties.ConclusionThe rate of completeness of the NJR total elbow arthroplasty dataset is currently 93% and the accuracy is 98%. This audit identified challenges of data capture with regard to RHAs. Collaboration with a trauma and orthopaedic trainees through the British Orthopaedic Trainee Association improved the completeness and accuracy of the NJR elbow dataset, which will improve the validity of the reports and of the associated research.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(12):1461–1468.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1461-1468
Number of pages8
JournalBone and Joint Journal
Volume106-B
Issue number12
Early online date1 Dec 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2024

Keywords

  • National Joint Registry (NJR)
  • Elbow arthroplasty
  • Data quality audit
  • Radial head arthroplasties (RHAs)
  • Completeness and accuracy
  • Hospital Episode Statistics (HES)
  • Dataset improvement
  • National collaborative audit
  • Trauma and orthopaedics
  • British Orthopaedic Trainee Association
  • Total elbow arthroplasty
  • Data mismatch
  • Data capture challenges
  • NHS hospitals
  • Validity of research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The National Joint Registry Data Quality Audit of Elbow Arthroplasty: NJR DQA-Elbows'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this