Abstract
This essay argues that short-lived newspapers, often overlooked as the expected casualties of a developing industry, were actually a significant proportion of the nineteenth century’s press. It explores the methodological problem of how to gauge the ‘shape’ of the nineteenth-century press, particularly in terms of relative longevity of publication, offering a critique of the sources and systems of knowledge that have moulded our conception of the industry. Analysing datasets drawn from nineteenth-, twentieth- and twenty-first-century sources, this approach provides a fresh perspective that restores short-lived nineteenth-century newspapers to greater prominence, suggesting an imbalance in historical research focused on longstanding newspapers.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 30-61 |
| Number of pages | 31 |
| Journal | Victorian Periodicals Review |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue number | 1-2 |
| Publication status | Published - 19 Feb 2025 |
Keywords
- short-lived newspapers
- Nineteenth-Century Periodicals
- Longevity
- Nineteenth-Century
- nineteenth-century press
- historical research
- longstanding newspapers