The Laws of Normal Organic Life or Stanislavski Explained: Towards a scientific account of the subconscious in Stanislavski’s system

R. Connolly, R. Ralley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper explores the relationship between Stanislavski's ideas about the inward preparation of the actor and contemporary accounts of human behaviour derived from scientific psychology. The paper first sets out a summary of some of Stanislavski's key ideas about the behavioural and psychological processes an actor might undergo when developing a role (i.e., the operational processes Stanislavski advocates in order to achieve a particular effect or outcome) and then examines how far current evidence supports the relationship between cause and effect that Stanislavski describes. In doing so, the paper places particular emphasis on Stanislavski's attempts to activate nonconscious processes in the actor as a means of confronting what he calls ‘forced, conventional untruthfulness’ in stage presentation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)237-259
JournalStudies in Theatre and Performance
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Human Behavior
Causes
Summary
Psychology
Psychological
Conventional

Cite this

@article{e56345d0979f43a2b38219e740129e56,
title = "The Laws of Normal Organic Life or Stanislavski Explained: Towards a scientific account of the subconscious in Stanislavski’s system",
abstract = "This paper explores the relationship between Stanislavski's ideas about the inward preparation of the actor and contemporary accounts of human behaviour derived from scientific psychology. The paper first sets out a summary of some of Stanislavski's key ideas about the behavioural and psychological processes an actor might undergo when developing a role (i.e., the operational processes Stanislavski advocates in order to achieve a particular effect or outcome) and then examines how far current evidence supports the relationship between cause and effect that Stanislavski describes. In doing so, the paper places particular emphasis on Stanislavski's attempts to activate nonconscious processes in the actor as a means of confronting what he calls ‘forced, conventional untruthfulness’ in stage presentation.",
author = "R. Connolly and R. Ralley",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1386/stap.27.3.237/1",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "237--259",
journal = "Studies in Theatre and Performance",
issn = "1468-2761",
publisher = "Intellect Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

The Laws of Normal Organic Life or Stanislavski Explained: Towards a scientific account of the subconscious in Stanislavski’s system. / Connolly, R.; Ralley, R.

In: Studies in Theatre and Performance, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2007, p. 237-259.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Laws of Normal Organic Life or Stanislavski Explained: Towards a scientific account of the subconscious in Stanislavski’s system

AU - Connolly, R.

AU - Ralley, R.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - This paper explores the relationship between Stanislavski's ideas about the inward preparation of the actor and contemporary accounts of human behaviour derived from scientific psychology. The paper first sets out a summary of some of Stanislavski's key ideas about the behavioural and psychological processes an actor might undergo when developing a role (i.e., the operational processes Stanislavski advocates in order to achieve a particular effect or outcome) and then examines how far current evidence supports the relationship between cause and effect that Stanislavski describes. In doing so, the paper places particular emphasis on Stanislavski's attempts to activate nonconscious processes in the actor as a means of confronting what he calls ‘forced, conventional untruthfulness’ in stage presentation.

AB - This paper explores the relationship between Stanislavski's ideas about the inward preparation of the actor and contemporary accounts of human behaviour derived from scientific psychology. The paper first sets out a summary of some of Stanislavski's key ideas about the behavioural and psychological processes an actor might undergo when developing a role (i.e., the operational processes Stanislavski advocates in order to achieve a particular effect or outcome) and then examines how far current evidence supports the relationship between cause and effect that Stanislavski describes. In doing so, the paper places particular emphasis on Stanislavski's attempts to activate nonconscious processes in the actor as a means of confronting what he calls ‘forced, conventional untruthfulness’ in stage presentation.

U2 - 10.1386/stap.27.3.237/1

DO - 10.1386/stap.27.3.237/1

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 237

EP - 259

JO - Studies in Theatre and Performance

JF - Studies in Theatre and Performance

SN - 1468-2761

IS - 3

ER -