The influence of running shoes on inter-segmental foot kinematics

Ben Langley, Mary cramp, Stewart C. Morrison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
24 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of motion control, neutral and cushioned running shoes upon inter-segmental foot kinematics. Twenty-eight active males completed one testing session, in which they ran in standardised motion control, neutral and cushioned running shoes on a treadmill at a self-selected pace (2.9 ± 0.6 m·s−1). Incisions were made within the shoes to enable the motion of the foot to be tracked using a motion analysis system and inter-segmental foot kinematics calculated using the Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli foot model. Discrete parameters associated with midfoot–rearfoot, forefoot–rearfoot, forefoot–midfoot and medial longitudinal arch motion were compared between footwear conditions. Midfoot–rearfoot eversion upon initial contact and peak medial longitudinal arch angles (MLAA) were significantly lower in the motion control shoe compared to the neutral and cushioned shoes. The reductions in midfoot–rearfoot eversion and medial longitudinal arch deformation in the motion control running shoe may be due to increased medial posting and torsional control systems in this shoe. However, these changes in midfoot kinematics may be offset by significant increases in sagittal plane midfoot–rearfoot and forefoot–rearfoot range of motion, particularly during mid-stance.
Original languageEnglish
JournalFootwear Science
Early online date12 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 12 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

Shoes
Motion control
Biomechanical Phenomena
Foot
Kinematics
Arches
Exercise equipment
systems analysis
control system
contact
Control systems
Articular Range of Motion
Testing

Keywords

  • footwear
  • multi-segment foot model
  • medial longitudinal arch
  • running
  • kinematics

Cite this

@article{0cf5a5fa4968468f96eaf7061630ca1f,
title = "The influence of running shoes on inter-segmental foot kinematics",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to determine the influence of motion control, neutral and cushioned running shoes upon inter-segmental foot kinematics. Twenty-eight active males completed one testing session, in which they ran in standardised motion control, neutral and cushioned running shoes on a treadmill at a self-selected pace (2.9 ± 0.6 m·s−1). Incisions were made within the shoes to enable the motion of the foot to be tracked using a motion analysis system and inter-segmental foot kinematics calculated using the Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli foot model. Discrete parameters associated with midfoot–rearfoot, forefoot–rearfoot, forefoot–midfoot and medial longitudinal arch motion were compared between footwear conditions. Midfoot–rearfoot eversion upon initial contact and peak medial longitudinal arch angles (MLAA) were significantly lower in the motion control shoe compared to the neutral and cushioned shoes. The reductions in midfoot–rearfoot eversion and medial longitudinal arch deformation in the motion control running shoe may be due to increased medial posting and torsional control systems in this shoe. However, these changes in midfoot kinematics may be offset by significant increases in sagittal plane midfoot–rearfoot and forefoot–rearfoot range of motion, particularly during mid-stance.",
keywords = "footwear, multi-segment foot model, medial longitudinal arch, running, kinematics",
author = "Ben Langley and Mary cramp and Morrison, {Stewart C.}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "12",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1080/19424280.2018.1448005",
language = "English",
journal = "Footwear Science",
issn = "1942-4280",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis Online",

}

The influence of running shoes on inter-segmental foot kinematics. / Langley, Ben; cramp, Mary; Morrison, Stewart C.

In: Footwear Science, 12.03.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of running shoes on inter-segmental foot kinematics

AU - Langley, Ben

AU - cramp, Mary

AU - Morrison, Stewart C.

PY - 2018/3/12

Y1 - 2018/3/12

N2 - The aim of this study was to determine the influence of motion control, neutral and cushioned running shoes upon inter-segmental foot kinematics. Twenty-eight active males completed one testing session, in which they ran in standardised motion control, neutral and cushioned running shoes on a treadmill at a self-selected pace (2.9 ± 0.6 m·s−1). Incisions were made within the shoes to enable the motion of the foot to be tracked using a motion analysis system and inter-segmental foot kinematics calculated using the Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli foot model. Discrete parameters associated with midfoot–rearfoot, forefoot–rearfoot, forefoot–midfoot and medial longitudinal arch motion were compared between footwear conditions. Midfoot–rearfoot eversion upon initial contact and peak medial longitudinal arch angles (MLAA) were significantly lower in the motion control shoe compared to the neutral and cushioned shoes. The reductions in midfoot–rearfoot eversion and medial longitudinal arch deformation in the motion control running shoe may be due to increased medial posting and torsional control systems in this shoe. However, these changes in midfoot kinematics may be offset by significant increases in sagittal plane midfoot–rearfoot and forefoot–rearfoot range of motion, particularly during mid-stance.

AB - The aim of this study was to determine the influence of motion control, neutral and cushioned running shoes upon inter-segmental foot kinematics. Twenty-eight active males completed one testing session, in which they ran in standardised motion control, neutral and cushioned running shoes on a treadmill at a self-selected pace (2.9 ± 0.6 m·s−1). Incisions were made within the shoes to enable the motion of the foot to be tracked using a motion analysis system and inter-segmental foot kinematics calculated using the Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli foot model. Discrete parameters associated with midfoot–rearfoot, forefoot–rearfoot, forefoot–midfoot and medial longitudinal arch motion were compared between footwear conditions. Midfoot–rearfoot eversion upon initial contact and peak medial longitudinal arch angles (MLAA) were significantly lower in the motion control shoe compared to the neutral and cushioned shoes. The reductions in midfoot–rearfoot eversion and medial longitudinal arch deformation in the motion control running shoe may be due to increased medial posting and torsional control systems in this shoe. However, these changes in midfoot kinematics may be offset by significant increases in sagittal plane midfoot–rearfoot and forefoot–rearfoot range of motion, particularly during mid-stance.

KW - footwear

KW - multi-segment foot model

KW - medial longitudinal arch

KW - running

KW - kinematics

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1080/19424280.2018.1448005

DO - https://doi.org/10.1080/19424280.2018.1448005

M3 - Article

JO - Footwear Science

JF - Footwear Science

SN - 1942-4280

ER -