The illogic of logic models

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The article mounts a critique of the use of logic models in program evaluation, arguing that programs are typically populated with multiple, contested v=values and theories of change. The task of the evaluator is to interact with this diversity and report on it faithfully.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4-10
Number of pages7
JournalEvaluation Journal of Australasia
Volume16
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 31 Mar 2016

Fingerprint

evaluation
Values
programme

Cite this

@article{55e176f1ace14f0796d9dec4e3a3fe12,
title = "The illogic of logic models",
abstract = "The article mounts a critique of the use of logic models in program evaluation, arguing that programs are typically populated with multiple, contested v=values and theories of change. The task of the evaluator is to interact with this diversity and report on it faithfully.",
author = "SAVILLE KUSHNER",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "31",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "4--10",
journal = "Evaluation Journal of Australasia",
issn = "1035-719X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

The illogic of logic models. / KUSHNER, SAVILLE.

In: Evaluation Journal of Australasia, Vol. 16, No. 1, 31.03.2016, p. 4-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The illogic of logic models

AU - KUSHNER, SAVILLE

PY - 2016/3/31

Y1 - 2016/3/31

N2 - The article mounts a critique of the use of logic models in program evaluation, arguing that programs are typically populated with multiple, contested v=values and theories of change. The task of the evaluator is to interact with this diversity and report on it faithfully.

AB - The article mounts a critique of the use of logic models in program evaluation, arguing that programs are typically populated with multiple, contested v=values and theories of change. The task of the evaluator is to interact with this diversity and report on it faithfully.

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 4

EP - 10

JO - Evaluation Journal of Australasia

JF - Evaluation Journal of Australasia

SN - 1035-719X

IS - 1

ER -