Abstract
The article mounts a critique of the use of logic models in program evaluation, arguing that programs are typically populated with multiple, contested v=values and theories of change. The task of the evaluator is to interact with this diversity and report on it faithfully.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 4-10 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Evaluation Journal of Australasia |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 31 Mar 2016 |