Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Ability of Monitor-Independent Movement Summary Units, Euclidean Norm Minus One, and Mean Amplitude Deviation to Harmonize Accelerometry Data Across Research-Grade and Consumer Wearable Devices During Simulated Free-Living Physical Activity in Children

  • Olivia L. Finnegan
  • , James W. White III
  • , Bridget Armstrong
  • , Elizabeth L. Adams
  • , Sarah Burkart
  • , Michael W. Beets
  • , Srihari Nelakuditi
  • , Zifei Zhong
  • , Hongpeng Yang
  • , Keagan P. Kiely
  • , Rahul Ghosal
  • , Stuart J. Fairclough
  • , Gregory J. Welk
  • , R. Glenn Weaver
  • University of South Carolina
  • Coldesportes
  • Iowa State University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (journal)peer-review

30 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Epoch-level accelerometry summary metrics have the potential to be device-agnostic, meaning that similar estimates should be obtained regardless of the device used. The objective of this study was to identify which metric (Euclidean Norm Minus One [ENMO], mean amplitude deviation [MAD], and Monitor-Independent Movement Summary [MIMS] units) best harmonizes data across devices in an applied setting measuring children’s activity. Methods: Children (n = 239; 9.3 ± 2.1 years, 47% female, 30% Black) wore ActiGraph GT9X (+/−8 g, 50 Hz) accelerometers and were randomized to wear two of three consumer wearables, including Apple Watch Series 7 (+/−16 g, 50 Hz), Garmin Vivoactive 4S (+/−8 g, 25 Hz), and Fitbit Sense (+/−4 g, 50 Hz) on their nondominant wrist while participating in 60 min of simulated free-living activities (i.e., walking, running, and soccer). The standard deviation across z scores for ENMO, MAD, and MIMS of each device was calculated at the second level to quantify variability across devices. Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient was calculated for each combination of devices by metric to determine agreement. Multilevel intraclass correlation coefficients were additionally used to quantify harmonization. Results: The standard deviation of z score across devices was the lowest, indicating better harmonization, for MAD (0.13 ± 0.23), followed by ENMO (0.24 ± 0.50), and then MIMS (0.26 ± 0.39). Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient was strongest for MAD, with coefficients ranging from .89 to .96. Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient for MIMS ranged from .70 to .83 and was lowest for ENMO, ranging from .62 to .76. Overall intraclass correlation coefficient was highest for MAD (.88), followed by MIMS (.73), and ENMO (.62). Conclusions: MAD appears to perform best at harmonizing across all the sampled research-grade and consumer devices in children.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-25
Number of pages25
JournalJournal for the Measurement of Physical Behaviour
Volume8
Issue number1
Early online date19 Aug 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Aug 2025

Keywords

  • ENMO
  • MAD
  • MIMS
  • accelerometer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Ability of Monitor-Independent Movement Summary Units, Euclidean Norm Minus One, and Mean Amplitude Deviation to Harmonize Accelerometry Data Across Research-Grade and Consumer Wearable Devices During Simulated Free-Living Physical Activity in Children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this