Tensions between indoctrination and the development of judgement: the case against early closure

M. Ashley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)


This article explores the notion of sound judgement by citizens in environmentally attentive democracies. The argument is against indoctrination, and in favour of greater continuity and progression throughout all phases of education. A democratic education that is attentive to issues of environmental sustainability will need to draw on the evidence base of science. This is necessary but not sufficient. Learners need to be able to synthesise understanding from a range of disciplines, including those that address questions of value and judgement. Knowledge and understanding alone do not necessarily lead to a commitment to action for sustainability, and this can result in temptations to take short cuts that result in pupils making rhetorical commitments. The paper looks to the liberal educational philosophy of Paul Hirst as a basis for curriculum analysis and argues that the ability to synthesise an understanding of environmental and sustainable development issues from the irreducible forms of knowledge proposed by Hirst is an advanced skill that requires development over a protracted period.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-197
JournalEnvironmental Education Research
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2005


Dive into the research topics of 'Tensions between indoctrination and the development of judgement: the case against early closure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this