Telephone or face-to-face interviews?: a decision made on the basis of a pilot study

K Wilson, Brenda Roe, L Wright

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

De Vaus (1991) highlights five main considerations that may be key factors in decisions about whether to use telephone or face-to-face interviews for survey work: response rates, ability to produce representative samples, effects on interview schedule design, quality of responses and implementation problems. De Vaus discussion of these five issues is outlined at the start of this article. The five issues are then applied to the experiences of researchers conducting a study on continence care. Description and discussion of pilot interviews, which explored both interview modes, are followed by a similar examination of the main study which employed telephone interviews. Ideas in this discussion are supported and challenged by reference to other publications on the subject of telephone and face-to-face interviews. The success of the decision to use telephone interviews in the main study is evaluated and recommendations are made.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)314-321
JournalInternational Journal of Nursing Studies
Volume35
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Telephone
Interviews
Appointments and Schedules
Research Personnel

Cite this

@article{6c2f6d4a469b45b5bf5abf552a8b28bf,
title = "Telephone or face-to-face interviews?: a decision made on the basis of a pilot study",
abstract = "De Vaus (1991) highlights five main considerations that may be key factors in decisions about whether to use telephone or face-to-face interviews for survey work: response rates, ability to produce representative samples, effects on interview schedule design, quality of responses and implementation problems. De Vaus discussion of these five issues is outlined at the start of this article. The five issues are then applied to the experiences of researchers conducting a study on continence care. Description and discussion of pilot interviews, which explored both interview modes, are followed by a similar examination of the main study which employed telephone interviews. Ideas in this discussion are supported and challenged by reference to other publications on the subject of telephone and face-to-face interviews. The success of the decision to use telephone interviews in the main study is evaluated and recommendations are made.",
author = "K Wilson and Brenda Roe and L Wright",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.1016/S0020-7489(98)00044-3",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "314--321",
journal = "International Journal of Nursing Studies",
issn = "0020-7489",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Telephone or face-to-face interviews?: a decision made on the basis of a pilot study. / Wilson, K; Roe, Brenda; Wright, L.

In: International Journal of Nursing Studies, Vol. 35, 1998, p. 314-321.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Telephone or face-to-face interviews?: a decision made on the basis of a pilot study

AU - Wilson, K

AU - Roe, Brenda

AU - Wright, L

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - De Vaus (1991) highlights five main considerations that may be key factors in decisions about whether to use telephone or face-to-face interviews for survey work: response rates, ability to produce representative samples, effects on interview schedule design, quality of responses and implementation problems. De Vaus discussion of these five issues is outlined at the start of this article. The five issues are then applied to the experiences of researchers conducting a study on continence care. Description and discussion of pilot interviews, which explored both interview modes, are followed by a similar examination of the main study which employed telephone interviews. Ideas in this discussion are supported and challenged by reference to other publications on the subject of telephone and face-to-face interviews. The success of the decision to use telephone interviews in the main study is evaluated and recommendations are made.

AB - De Vaus (1991) highlights five main considerations that may be key factors in decisions about whether to use telephone or face-to-face interviews for survey work: response rates, ability to produce representative samples, effects on interview schedule design, quality of responses and implementation problems. De Vaus discussion of these five issues is outlined at the start of this article. The five issues are then applied to the experiences of researchers conducting a study on continence care. Description and discussion of pilot interviews, which explored both interview modes, are followed by a similar examination of the main study which employed telephone interviews. Ideas in this discussion are supported and challenged by reference to other publications on the subject of telephone and face-to-face interviews. The success of the decision to use telephone interviews in the main study is evaluated and recommendations are made.

U2 - 10.1016/S0020-7489(98)00044-3

DO - 10.1016/S0020-7489(98)00044-3

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 314

EP - 321

JO - International Journal of Nursing Studies

JF - International Journal of Nursing Studies

SN - 0020-7489

ER -