Abstract
This article considers the nature of collusion between the British state and loyalist paramilitary organisations during the conflict in Northern Ireland in the context of British counterinsurgency theory and practices in prior colonial
campaigns. It briefly outlines the nature, pattern and logic of collusion in Northern Ireland before examining some of the key works of British counterinsurgency theorists – Charles Callwell, Charles Gwynn and Frank Kitson – reflecting on earlier imperial experiences. Collusion is understood as an expedient coercive state practice, premised on a ‘doctrine of necessity’, designed to remove ‘enemies’ and induce fear in a target population via a strategy of assassination in which the appearance of adherence to the rule of law is a political end shaping the specific forms of state violence involved. Such a practice, the author argues, is not an aberration in the tradition of British state counterinsurgency violence, it is exemplary.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3-23 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Race and Class |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 14 Jul 2015 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Finucane
- Kitson
- Northern Ireland
- collusion
- counter-gangs
- counterinsurgency
- irregular warfare
- state violence
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'State violence and the colonial roots of collusion in Northern Ireland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 18 Citations
- 1 Book
-
Counterinsurgency and Collusion in Northern Ireland
MCGOVERN, M., 21 Mar 2019, London: Pluto Press. 256 p.Research output: Book/Report › Book › peer-review
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver