State violence and the colonial roots of collusion in Northern Ireland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article considers the nature of collusion between the British state and loyalist paramilitary organisations during the conflict in Northern Ireland in the context of British counterinsurgency theory and practices in prior colonial campaigns. It briefly outlines the nature, pattern and logic of collusion in Northern Ireland before examining some of the key works of British counterinsurgency theorists – Charles Callwell, Charles Gwynn and Frank Kitson – reflecting on earlier imperial experiences. Collusion is understood as an expedient coercive state practice, premised on a ‘doctrine of necessity’, designed to remove ‘enemies’ and induce fear in a target population via a strategy of assassination in which the appearance of adherence to the rule of law is a political end shaping the specific forms of state violence involved. Such a practice, the author argues, is not an aberration in the tradition of British state counterinsurgency violence, it is exemplary.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-23
JournalRace and Class
Volume57
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 14 Jul 2015

Fingerprint

violence
logic
constitutional state
doctrine
anxiety
Counterinsurgency
Northern Ireland
Colonies
experience
Loyalist
Rule of Law
Paramilitaries
Assassination
Doctrine
Nature
Enemy
Adherence
Logic
Theorists

Cite this

@article{5feecfb88c174d768b009544a9706db1,
title = "State violence and the colonial roots of collusion in Northern Ireland",
abstract = "This article considers the nature of collusion between the British state and loyalist paramilitary organisations during the conflict in Northern Ireland in the context of British counterinsurgency theory and practices in prior colonial campaigns. It briefly outlines the nature, pattern and logic of collusion in Northern Ireland before examining some of the key works of British counterinsurgency theorists – Charles Callwell, Charles Gwynn and Frank Kitson – reflecting on earlier imperial experiences. Collusion is understood as an expedient coercive state practice, premised on a ‘doctrine of necessity’, designed to remove ‘enemies’ and induce fear in a target population via a strategy of assassination in which the appearance of adherence to the rule of law is a political end shaping the specific forms of state violence involved. Such a practice, the author argues, is not an aberration in the tradition of British state counterinsurgency violence, it is exemplary.",
author = "Mark McGovern",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1177/0306396815595200",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "3--23",
journal = "Race and Class",
issn = "0306-3968",
publisher = "Sage",
number = "2",

}

State violence and the colonial roots of collusion in Northern Ireland. / McGovern, Mark.

In: Race and Class, Vol. 57, No. 2, 14.07.2015, p. 3-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - State violence and the colonial roots of collusion in Northern Ireland

AU - McGovern, Mark

PY - 2015/7/14

Y1 - 2015/7/14

N2 - This article considers the nature of collusion between the British state and loyalist paramilitary organisations during the conflict in Northern Ireland in the context of British counterinsurgency theory and practices in prior colonial campaigns. It briefly outlines the nature, pattern and logic of collusion in Northern Ireland before examining some of the key works of British counterinsurgency theorists – Charles Callwell, Charles Gwynn and Frank Kitson – reflecting on earlier imperial experiences. Collusion is understood as an expedient coercive state practice, premised on a ‘doctrine of necessity’, designed to remove ‘enemies’ and induce fear in a target population via a strategy of assassination in which the appearance of adherence to the rule of law is a political end shaping the specific forms of state violence involved. Such a practice, the author argues, is not an aberration in the tradition of British state counterinsurgency violence, it is exemplary.

AB - This article considers the nature of collusion between the British state and loyalist paramilitary organisations during the conflict in Northern Ireland in the context of British counterinsurgency theory and practices in prior colonial campaigns. It briefly outlines the nature, pattern and logic of collusion in Northern Ireland before examining some of the key works of British counterinsurgency theorists – Charles Callwell, Charles Gwynn and Frank Kitson – reflecting on earlier imperial experiences. Collusion is understood as an expedient coercive state practice, premised on a ‘doctrine of necessity’, designed to remove ‘enemies’ and induce fear in a target population via a strategy of assassination in which the appearance of adherence to the rule of law is a political end shaping the specific forms of state violence involved. Such a practice, the author argues, is not an aberration in the tradition of British state counterinsurgency violence, it is exemplary.

U2 - 10.1177/0306396815595200

DO - 10.1177/0306396815595200

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 3

EP - 23

JO - Race and Class

JF - Race and Class

SN - 0306-3968

IS - 2

ER -