Sound design and balanced analyses: Response to rack and colleagues

Roderick I. Nicolson; David Reynolds

doi:10.1002/dys.337

Sound design and balanced analyses: Response to rack and colleagues

Roderick I. Nicolson^*
, David Reynolds

^*Corresponding author for this work

Psychology

University of Sheffield
University of Exeter

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rack, Snowling, Hulme and Gibbs (Dyslexia, 2007) provide a polemical critique of Reynolds and Nicolson (Dyslexia, 2007). We present further statistical analyses, as suggested. The further analyses confirm the findings reported. We also present a brief critique of the applicability of the clinical trials methodology to education.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	105-109
Number of pages	5
Journal	Dyslexia
Volume	13
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.337
Publication status	Published - 1 May 2007

Keywords

Cerebellum
Dyslexia
Exercise
Intervention
Reading

Access to Document

10.1002/dys.337

Cite this

@article{d8761633b3a34b318798d1c9abfb2bd4,

title = "Sound design and balanced analyses: Response to rack and colleagues",

abstract = "Rack, Snowling, Hulme and Gibbs (Dyslexia, 2007) provide a polemical critique of Reynolds and Nicolson (Dyslexia, 2007). We present further statistical analyses, as suggested. The further analyses confirm the findings reported. We also present a brief critique of the applicability of the clinical trials methodology to education.",

keywords = "Cerebellum, Dyslexia, Exercise, Intervention, Reading",

author = "Nicolson, \{Roderick I.\} and David Reynolds",

year = "2007",

month = may,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1002/dys.337",

language = "English",

volume = "13",

pages = "105--109",

journal = "Dyslexia",

issn = "1076-9242",

publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sound design and balanced analyses

T2 - Response to rack and colleagues

AU - Nicolson, Roderick I.

AU - Reynolds, David

PY - 2007/5/1

Y1 - 2007/5/1

N2 - Rack, Snowling, Hulme and Gibbs (Dyslexia, 2007) provide a polemical critique of Reynolds and Nicolson (Dyslexia, 2007). We present further statistical analyses, as suggested. The further analyses confirm the findings reported. We also present a brief critique of the applicability of the clinical trials methodology to education.

AB - Rack, Snowling, Hulme and Gibbs (Dyslexia, 2007) provide a polemical critique of Reynolds and Nicolson (Dyslexia, 2007). We present further statistical analyses, as suggested. The further analyses confirm the findings reported. We also present a brief critique of the applicability of the clinical trials methodology to education.

KW - Cerebellum

KW - Dyslexia

KW - Exercise

KW - Intervention

KW - Reading

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/34249797279

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/34249797279#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1002/dys.337

DO - 10.1002/dys.337

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:34249797279

SN - 1076-9242

VL - 13

SP - 105

EP - 109

JO - Dyslexia

JF - Dyslexia

IS - 2

ER -

Sound design and balanced analyses: Response to rack and colleagues

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this