TY - JOUR
T1 - Simultaneous segmentation and generalisation of non-adjacent dependencies from continuous speech
AU - Frost, Rebecca L.A.
AU - Monaghan, Padraic
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the International Centre for Language and Communicative Development (LuCiD) at Lancaster University, funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (UK) [ ES/L008955/1 ].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2016/2/1
Y1 - 2016/2/1
N2 - Language learning requires mastering multiple tasks, including segmenting speech to identify words, and learning the syntactic role of these words within sentences. A key question in language acquisition research is the extent to which these tasks are sequential or successive, and consequently whether they may be driven by distinct or similar computations. We explored a classic artificial language learning paradigm, where the language structure is defined in terms of non-adjacent dependencies. We show that participants are able to use the same statistical information at the same time to segment continuous speech to both identify words and to generalise over the structure, when the generalisations were over novel speech that the participants had not previously experienced. We suggest that, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, the most economical explanation for the effects is that speech segmentation and grammatical generalisation are dependent on similar statistical processing mechanisms.
AB - Language learning requires mastering multiple tasks, including segmenting speech to identify words, and learning the syntactic role of these words within sentences. A key question in language acquisition research is the extent to which these tasks are sequential or successive, and consequently whether they may be driven by distinct or similar computations. We explored a classic artificial language learning paradigm, where the language structure is defined in terms of non-adjacent dependencies. We show that participants are able to use the same statistical information at the same time to segment continuous speech to both identify words and to generalise over the structure, when the generalisations were over novel speech that the participants had not previously experienced. We suggest that, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, the most economical explanation for the effects is that speech segmentation and grammatical generalisation are dependent on similar statistical processing mechanisms.
KW - Artificial grammar learning
KW - Grammatical processing
KW - Language acquisition
KW - Speech segmentation
KW - Statistical learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948175381&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948175381&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.11.010
DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.11.010
M3 - Article (journal)
C2 - 26638049
AN - SCOPUS:84948175381
SN - 0010-0277
VL - 147
SP - 70
EP - 74
JO - Cognition
JF - Cognition
ER -