Signal-to-noise ratios, instrument parameters and repeatability of Itrax XRF core scan measurements of floodplain sediments

Anna Jones, Jonathan Turner, Stephen Daly, Pierre Francus, Robin Edwards

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
33 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study used signal-to-noise ratios to assess the effects of increasing Itrax XRF instrument parameters, namely tube voltage, tube current and exposure time, on XRF spectra and measurement repeatability. Tests were performed on cores from British and Irish floodplains. Seven combinations of tube voltage and current and six exposure times were compared using signal-to-noise ratios for eight target elements. Signal-to-noise ratios may be substantially improved by selecting instrument parameters, particularly tube voltage, for specific target elements. They can also be used to assess element profile suitability for interpretation by comparison with the limit of quantification. Repeatability was assessed using the standard deviation of measurements in nine repeat scans. The variation in element levels in the majority of profiles is considerably greater than the variability in individual measurements.
Original languageEnglish
JournalQuaternary International
Early online date13 Sep 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 13 Sep 2018

Fingerprint

X-ray fluorescence
signal-to-noise ratio
floodplain
sediment
parameter
exposure

Keywords

  • XRF core scanning
  • signal-to-noise ratio
  • repeatability
  • palaeoenvironmental reconstruction

Cite this

@article{7becd3b0407040a5b00395bc8c54ba9e,
title = "Signal-to-noise ratios, instrument parameters and repeatability of Itrax XRF core scan measurements of floodplain sediments",
abstract = "This study used signal-to-noise ratios to assess the effects of increasing Itrax XRF instrument parameters, namely tube voltage, tube current and exposure time, on XRF spectra and measurement repeatability. Tests were performed on cores from British and Irish floodplains. Seven combinations of tube voltage and current and six exposure times were compared using signal-to-noise ratios for eight target elements. Signal-to-noise ratios may be substantially improved by selecting instrument parameters, particularly tube voltage, for specific target elements. They can also be used to assess element profile suitability for interpretation by comparison with the limit of quantification. Repeatability was assessed using the standard deviation of measurements in nine repeat scans. The variation in element levels in the majority of profiles is considerably greater than the variability in individual measurements.",
keywords = "XRF core scanning, signal-to-noise ratio, repeatability, palaeoenvironmental reconstruction",
author = "Anna Jones and Jonathan Turner and Stephen Daly and Pierre Francus and Robin Edwards",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1016/j.quaint.2018.09.006",
language = "English",
journal = "Quaternary International",
issn = "1040-6182",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Signal-to-noise ratios, instrument parameters and repeatability of Itrax XRF core scan measurements of floodplain sediments. / Jones, Anna; Turner, Jonathan; Daly, Stephen; Francus, Pierre; Edwards, Robin.

In: Quaternary International, 13.09.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Signal-to-noise ratios, instrument parameters and repeatability of Itrax XRF core scan measurements of floodplain sediments

AU - Jones, Anna

AU - Turner, Jonathan

AU - Daly, Stephen

AU - Francus, Pierre

AU - Edwards, Robin

PY - 2018/9/13

Y1 - 2018/9/13

N2 - This study used signal-to-noise ratios to assess the effects of increasing Itrax XRF instrument parameters, namely tube voltage, tube current and exposure time, on XRF spectra and measurement repeatability. Tests were performed on cores from British and Irish floodplains. Seven combinations of tube voltage and current and six exposure times were compared using signal-to-noise ratios for eight target elements. Signal-to-noise ratios may be substantially improved by selecting instrument parameters, particularly tube voltage, for specific target elements. They can also be used to assess element profile suitability for interpretation by comparison with the limit of quantification. Repeatability was assessed using the standard deviation of measurements in nine repeat scans. The variation in element levels in the majority of profiles is considerably greater than the variability in individual measurements.

AB - This study used signal-to-noise ratios to assess the effects of increasing Itrax XRF instrument parameters, namely tube voltage, tube current and exposure time, on XRF spectra and measurement repeatability. Tests were performed on cores from British and Irish floodplains. Seven combinations of tube voltage and current and six exposure times were compared using signal-to-noise ratios for eight target elements. Signal-to-noise ratios may be substantially improved by selecting instrument parameters, particularly tube voltage, for specific target elements. They can also be used to assess element profile suitability for interpretation by comparison with the limit of quantification. Repeatability was assessed using the standard deviation of measurements in nine repeat scans. The variation in element levels in the majority of profiles is considerably greater than the variability in individual measurements.

KW - XRF core scanning

KW - signal-to-noise ratio

KW - repeatability

KW - palaeoenvironmental reconstruction

U2 - 10.1016/j.quaint.2018.09.006

DO - 10.1016/j.quaint.2018.09.006

M3 - Article

JO - Quaternary International

JF - Quaternary International

SN - 1040-6182

ER -