Sightless Vision: Reflections on a Paradox

Peter Wheeler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Vision is frequently understood in terms of both an ability to see, and equally an ability to draw on personal experiences, technological knowledge and expert status to predict future events. The central theme this paper addresses is whether vision is inextricably linked to sight. This question has implications for culture and organisation studies, as axiomatically it is frequently assumed that people engaged with organisations either possess a full range of senses (Pink 2008), or tend to marginalise sensory experiences (Corbett 2006). However, worthy as the study of the senses in culture and organisational research undoubtedly is, the research is frequently conducted at a singularly theoretical level and the lack of disabled researchers in the academy has been well documented (Barnes 2003; Duckett and Pratt 2007; Oliver 1997). This paper bridges the divide between theory and praxis by reflecting on the utility of social research methods from the experiential perspective of a blind researcher.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)285-304
JournalCulture and Organization
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

ability
social research
academy
research method
experience
expert
event
lack
Paradox
Technological knowledge
Organization studies
Research methods
Praxis
Organizational research

Cite this

Wheeler, Peter. / Sightless Vision: Reflections on a Paradox. In: Culture and Organization. 2012 ; Vol. 18, No. 4. pp. 285-304.
@article{d76d63b6176f4ddaa4f615f2f5665540,
title = "Sightless Vision: Reflections on a Paradox",
abstract = "Vision is frequently understood in terms of both an ability to see, and equally an ability to draw on personal experiences, technological knowledge and expert status to predict future events. The central theme this paper addresses is whether vision is inextricably linked to sight. This question has implications for culture and organisation studies, as axiomatically it is frequently assumed that people engaged with organisations either possess a full range of senses (Pink 2008), or tend to marginalise sensory experiences (Corbett 2006). However, worthy as the study of the senses in culture and organisational research undoubtedly is, the research is frequently conducted at a singularly theoretical level and the lack of disabled researchers in the academy has been well documented (Barnes 2003; Duckett and Pratt 2007; Oliver 1997). This paper bridges the divide between theory and praxis by reflecting on the utility of social research methods from the experiential perspective of a blind researcher.",
author = "Peter Wheeler",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1080/14759551.2012.705527",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "285--304",
journal = "Culture and Organization",
issn = "1475-9551",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "4",

}

Sightless Vision: Reflections on a Paradox. / Wheeler, Peter.

In: Culture and Organization, Vol. 18, No. 4, 09.2012, p. 285-304.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sightless Vision: Reflections on a Paradox

AU - Wheeler, Peter

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Vision is frequently understood in terms of both an ability to see, and equally an ability to draw on personal experiences, technological knowledge and expert status to predict future events. The central theme this paper addresses is whether vision is inextricably linked to sight. This question has implications for culture and organisation studies, as axiomatically it is frequently assumed that people engaged with organisations either possess a full range of senses (Pink 2008), or tend to marginalise sensory experiences (Corbett 2006). However, worthy as the study of the senses in culture and organisational research undoubtedly is, the research is frequently conducted at a singularly theoretical level and the lack of disabled researchers in the academy has been well documented (Barnes 2003; Duckett and Pratt 2007; Oliver 1997). This paper bridges the divide between theory and praxis by reflecting on the utility of social research methods from the experiential perspective of a blind researcher.

AB - Vision is frequently understood in terms of both an ability to see, and equally an ability to draw on personal experiences, technological knowledge and expert status to predict future events. The central theme this paper addresses is whether vision is inextricably linked to sight. This question has implications for culture and organisation studies, as axiomatically it is frequently assumed that people engaged with organisations either possess a full range of senses (Pink 2008), or tend to marginalise sensory experiences (Corbett 2006). However, worthy as the study of the senses in culture and organisational research undoubtedly is, the research is frequently conducted at a singularly theoretical level and the lack of disabled researchers in the academy has been well documented (Barnes 2003; Duckett and Pratt 2007; Oliver 1997). This paper bridges the divide between theory and praxis by reflecting on the utility of social research methods from the experiential perspective of a blind researcher.

U2 - 10.1080/14759551.2012.705527

DO - 10.1080/14759551.2012.705527

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 285

EP - 304

JO - Culture and Organization

JF - Culture and Organization

SN - 1475-9551

IS - 4

ER -