Shaming Encounters: Reflections on Contemporary Understandings of Social Inequality and Health

Marian Peacock, Paul Bissell, Jenny Owen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The idea that social inequality has deleterious consequences for population health is well established within social epidemiology and medical sociology (Marmot and Wilkinson, 2001; Scambler, 2012). In this article, we critically examine arguments advanced by Wilkinson and Pickett in The Spirit Level (2009) that in more unequal countries population health suffers, in part, because of the stress and anxiety arising from individuals making invidious or shame-inducing comparisons with others regarding their social position. We seek to extend their arguments, drawing on sociologically informed studies exploring how people reflect on issues of social comparison and shame, how they resist shame, and the resources, such as ‘collective imaginaries’ (Bouchard, 2009), which may be deployed to protect against these invidious comparisons. We build on the arguments outlined in The Spirit Level, positing a sociologically informed account of shame connected to contemporary understandings of class and neoliberalism, as well as inequality.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)387-402
JournalSociology
Volume48
Issue number2
Early online date18 Jul 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2014

Fingerprint

shame
social inequality
health
medical sociology
social position
epidemiology
neoliberalism
anxiety
resources

Keywords

  • health inequality
  • income inequality
  • shame
  • social comparison
  • social epidemiology

Cite this

@article{6fefaff7a64942038efac5bc02dbfb50,
title = "Shaming Encounters: Reflections on Contemporary Understandings of Social Inequality and Health",
abstract = "The idea that social inequality has deleterious consequences for population health is well established within social epidemiology and medical sociology (Marmot and Wilkinson, 2001; Scambler, 2012). In this article, we critically examine arguments advanced by Wilkinson and Pickett in The Spirit Level (2009) that in more unequal countries population health suffers, in part, because of the stress and anxiety arising from individuals making invidious or shame-inducing comparisons with others regarding their social position. We seek to extend their arguments, drawing on sociologically informed studies exploring how people reflect on issues of social comparison and shame, how they resist shame, and the resources, such as ‘collective imaginaries’ (Bouchard, 2009), which may be deployed to protect against these invidious comparisons. We build on the arguments outlined in The Spirit Level, positing a sociologically informed account of shame connected to contemporary understandings of class and neoliberalism, as well as inequality.",
keywords = "health inequality, income inequality, shame, social comparison, social epidemiology",
author = "Marian Peacock and Paul Bissell and Jenny Owen",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0038038513490353",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "387--402",
journal = "Sociology",
issn = "0038-0385",
publisher = "Sage",
number = "2",

}

Shaming Encounters: Reflections on Contemporary Understandings of Social Inequality and Health. / Peacock, Marian; Bissell, Paul; Owen, Jenny.

In: Sociology, Vol. 48, No. 2, 01.04.2014, p. 387-402.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Shaming Encounters: Reflections on Contemporary Understandings of Social Inequality and Health

AU - Peacock, Marian

AU - Bissell, Paul

AU - Owen, Jenny

PY - 2014/4/1

Y1 - 2014/4/1

N2 - The idea that social inequality has deleterious consequences for population health is well established within social epidemiology and medical sociology (Marmot and Wilkinson, 2001; Scambler, 2012). In this article, we critically examine arguments advanced by Wilkinson and Pickett in The Spirit Level (2009) that in more unequal countries population health suffers, in part, because of the stress and anxiety arising from individuals making invidious or shame-inducing comparisons with others regarding their social position. We seek to extend their arguments, drawing on sociologically informed studies exploring how people reflect on issues of social comparison and shame, how they resist shame, and the resources, such as ‘collective imaginaries’ (Bouchard, 2009), which may be deployed to protect against these invidious comparisons. We build on the arguments outlined in The Spirit Level, positing a sociologically informed account of shame connected to contemporary understandings of class and neoliberalism, as well as inequality.

AB - The idea that social inequality has deleterious consequences for population health is well established within social epidemiology and medical sociology (Marmot and Wilkinson, 2001; Scambler, 2012). In this article, we critically examine arguments advanced by Wilkinson and Pickett in The Spirit Level (2009) that in more unequal countries population health suffers, in part, because of the stress and anxiety arising from individuals making invidious or shame-inducing comparisons with others regarding their social position. We seek to extend their arguments, drawing on sociologically informed studies exploring how people reflect on issues of social comparison and shame, how they resist shame, and the resources, such as ‘collective imaginaries’ (Bouchard, 2009), which may be deployed to protect against these invidious comparisons. We build on the arguments outlined in The Spirit Level, positing a sociologically informed account of shame connected to contemporary understandings of class and neoliberalism, as well as inequality.

KW - health inequality

KW - income inequality

KW - shame

KW - social comparison

KW - social epidemiology

U2 - 10.1177/0038038513490353

DO - 10.1177/0038038513490353

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 387

EP - 402

JO - Sociology

JF - Sociology

SN - 0038-0385

IS - 2

ER -