Sentencer confidence in probation: A good job in difficult circumstances?

Andrew Millie, Jessica Jacobson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Probation Services has seen as unprecedented period of change recently particularly with the formation of the National Probation Service in 2001, the introduction of new sentences with the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and then, from 2004, the creation of the National Offender Management Service (NOMS) (Carter, 2003). According to Farrow (2004) many experienced probation officers – despite maintaining commitment to the service – are now very demoralized and alienated. Along with complaints over workloads, targets and paperwork, those interviewed by Farrow were critical of ‘the stress caused by constant change and re-invention’ (p218). Davies (2004) writing in the Guardian put it thus: ‘Morale is low. The service has just gone through an exhausting restructuring, only to find that it is now to be restructured yet again’. In the midst of this change the authors of this article have been involved in a study of sentencing and its impact on the prison population (Hough et al., 2003; Millie et al., 2003). For this the views of judges and magistrates were canvassed on a range of issues relating to their sentencing decisions, including confidence in community-based sentences and in the probation service.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)112-117
JournalVista: Perspectives on Probation, Criminal Justice and Civil Renewal
Volume9
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Fingerprint

probation service
probation
confidence
probation officer
invention
complaint
workload
correctional institution
offender
restructuring
justice
act
commitment
management
community

Cite this

@article{593d1cfee74d4388bdb876c6e2e42e1a,
title = "Sentencer confidence in probation: A good job in difficult circumstances?",
abstract = "The Probation Services has seen as unprecedented period of change recently particularly with the formation of the National Probation Service in 2001, the introduction of new sentences with the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and then, from 2004, the creation of the National Offender Management Service (NOMS) (Carter, 2003). According to Farrow (2004) many experienced probation officers – despite maintaining commitment to the service – are now very demoralized and alienated. Along with complaints over workloads, targets and paperwork, those interviewed by Farrow were critical of ‘the stress caused by constant change and re-invention’ (p218). Davies (2004) writing in the Guardian put it thus: ‘Morale is low. The service has just gone through an exhausting restructuring, only to find that it is now to be restructured yet again’. In the midst of this change the authors of this article have been involved in a study of sentencing and its impact on the prison population (Hough et al., 2003; Millie et al., 2003). For this the views of judges and magistrates were canvassed on a range of issues relating to their sentencing decisions, including confidence in community-based sentences and in the probation service.",
author = "Andrew Millie and Jessica Jacobson",
year = "2004",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "112--117",
journal = "Vista: Perspectives on Probation, Criminal Justice and Civil Renewal",
issn = "1362-7163",
publisher = "Vista",
number = "2",

}

Sentencer confidence in probation: A good job in difficult circumstances? / Millie, Andrew; Jacobson, Jessica.

In: Vista: Perspectives on Probation, Criminal Justice and Civil Renewal, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2004, p. 112-117.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sentencer confidence in probation: A good job in difficult circumstances?

AU - Millie, Andrew

AU - Jacobson, Jessica

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - The Probation Services has seen as unprecedented period of change recently particularly with the formation of the National Probation Service in 2001, the introduction of new sentences with the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and then, from 2004, the creation of the National Offender Management Service (NOMS) (Carter, 2003). According to Farrow (2004) many experienced probation officers – despite maintaining commitment to the service – are now very demoralized and alienated. Along with complaints over workloads, targets and paperwork, those interviewed by Farrow were critical of ‘the stress caused by constant change and re-invention’ (p218). Davies (2004) writing in the Guardian put it thus: ‘Morale is low. The service has just gone through an exhausting restructuring, only to find that it is now to be restructured yet again’. In the midst of this change the authors of this article have been involved in a study of sentencing and its impact on the prison population (Hough et al., 2003; Millie et al., 2003). For this the views of judges and magistrates were canvassed on a range of issues relating to their sentencing decisions, including confidence in community-based sentences and in the probation service.

AB - The Probation Services has seen as unprecedented period of change recently particularly with the formation of the National Probation Service in 2001, the introduction of new sentences with the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and then, from 2004, the creation of the National Offender Management Service (NOMS) (Carter, 2003). According to Farrow (2004) many experienced probation officers – despite maintaining commitment to the service – are now very demoralized and alienated. Along with complaints over workloads, targets and paperwork, those interviewed by Farrow were critical of ‘the stress caused by constant change and re-invention’ (p218). Davies (2004) writing in the Guardian put it thus: ‘Morale is low. The service has just gone through an exhausting restructuring, only to find that it is now to be restructured yet again’. In the midst of this change the authors of this article have been involved in a study of sentencing and its impact on the prison population (Hough et al., 2003; Millie et al., 2003). For this the views of judges and magistrates were canvassed on a range of issues relating to their sentencing decisions, including confidence in community-based sentences and in the probation service.

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 112

EP - 117

JO - Vista: Perspectives on Probation, Criminal Justice and Civil Renewal

JF - Vista: Perspectives on Probation, Criminal Justice and Civil Renewal

SN - 1362-7163

IS - 2

ER -