See no evil? Only implicit attitudes predict unconscious eye movements towards images of climate change

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines how measures of both explicit and implicit attitudes to the environment relate to unconscious patterns of eye movements towards or away from iconic images of environmental damage and climate change. It found that those with a strong positive implicit attitude towards low carbon products spent significantly more time attending to negative images of climate change than positive images of nature in a ten second interval, and this occurred even in the first 200 milliseconds of looking. Those with a strong positive implicit attitude towards low carbon products also spent significantly more time attending to negative images of climate change in the first 200 milliseconds compared to those with a weaker implicit attitude. Measures of explicit attitude did not predict eye gaze towards the negative images in this way. In other words, there is a statistical association between implicit attitude (rather than explicit attitude) and how people focus their attention on iconic images of environmental damage and climate change. The study discusses the implication of this empirical finding for those attempting to mobilize consumers in the fight against climate change.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)315-339
Number of pages25
JournalSemiotica
Volume2012
Issue number192
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Oct 2012

Fingerprint

climate change
environmental damage
Climate Change
Evil
Eye Movements
Implicit Attitudes
Damage
Carbon
Iconic
time

Keywords

  • Environmental behavior
  • Implicit association test
  • Implicit-explicit attitudes
  • Sustainability
  • Unconscious eye movements

Cite this

@article{111349cd881b45e28d0685bb2c226b34,
title = "See no evil? Only implicit attitudes predict unconscious eye movements towards images of climate change",
abstract = "This paper examines how measures of both explicit and implicit attitudes to the environment relate to unconscious patterns of eye movements towards or away from iconic images of environmental damage and climate change. It found that those with a strong positive implicit attitude towards low carbon products spent significantly more time attending to negative images of climate change than positive images of nature in a ten second interval, and this occurred even in the first 200 milliseconds of looking. Those with a strong positive implicit attitude towards low carbon products also spent significantly more time attending to negative images of climate change in the first 200 milliseconds compared to those with a weaker implicit attitude. Measures of explicit attitude did not predict eye gaze towards the negative images in this way. In other words, there is a statistical association between implicit attitude (rather than explicit attitude) and how people focus their attention on iconic images of environmental damage and climate change. The study discusses the implication of this empirical finding for those attempting to mobilize consumers in the fight against climate change.",
keywords = "Environmental behavior, Implicit association test, Implicit-explicit attitudes, Sustainability, Unconscious eye movements",
author = "Geoffrey Beattie and Laura McGuire",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1515/sem-2012-0066",
language = "English",
volume = "2012",
pages = "315--339",
journal = "Semiotica",
issn = "0037-1998",
publisher = "de Gruyter",
number = "192",

}

See no evil? Only implicit attitudes predict unconscious eye movements towards images of climate change. / Beattie, Geoffrey; McGuire, Laura.

In: Semiotica, Vol. 2012, No. 192, 19.10.2012, p. 315-339.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - See no evil? Only implicit attitudes predict unconscious eye movements towards images of climate change

AU - Beattie, Geoffrey

AU - McGuire, Laura

PY - 2012/10/19

Y1 - 2012/10/19

N2 - This paper examines how measures of both explicit and implicit attitudes to the environment relate to unconscious patterns of eye movements towards or away from iconic images of environmental damage and climate change. It found that those with a strong positive implicit attitude towards low carbon products spent significantly more time attending to negative images of climate change than positive images of nature in a ten second interval, and this occurred even in the first 200 milliseconds of looking. Those with a strong positive implicit attitude towards low carbon products also spent significantly more time attending to negative images of climate change in the first 200 milliseconds compared to those with a weaker implicit attitude. Measures of explicit attitude did not predict eye gaze towards the negative images in this way. In other words, there is a statistical association between implicit attitude (rather than explicit attitude) and how people focus their attention on iconic images of environmental damage and climate change. The study discusses the implication of this empirical finding for those attempting to mobilize consumers in the fight against climate change.

AB - This paper examines how measures of both explicit and implicit attitudes to the environment relate to unconscious patterns of eye movements towards or away from iconic images of environmental damage and climate change. It found that those with a strong positive implicit attitude towards low carbon products spent significantly more time attending to negative images of climate change than positive images of nature in a ten second interval, and this occurred even in the first 200 milliseconds of looking. Those with a strong positive implicit attitude towards low carbon products also spent significantly more time attending to negative images of climate change in the first 200 milliseconds compared to those with a weaker implicit attitude. Measures of explicit attitude did not predict eye gaze towards the negative images in this way. In other words, there is a statistical association between implicit attitude (rather than explicit attitude) and how people focus their attention on iconic images of environmental damage and climate change. The study discusses the implication of this empirical finding for those attempting to mobilize consumers in the fight against climate change.

KW - Environmental behavior

KW - Implicit association test

KW - Implicit-explicit attitudes

KW - Sustainability

KW - Unconscious eye movements

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/see-evil-only-implicit-attitudes-predict-unconscious-eye-movements-towards-images-climate-change

U2 - 10.1515/sem-2012-0066

DO - 10.1515/sem-2012-0066

M3 - Article

VL - 2012

SP - 315

EP - 339

JO - Semiotica

JF - Semiotica

SN - 0037-1998

IS - 192

ER -