Abstract
The commentaries on our evaluation of the DDAT exercise treatment raise several common themes and several individual themes. We rebut criticisms in terms of research design, consider the comments made, and conclude that our evidence is indeed solid. We conclude by advocating 'science, sense and synergy' as the key to making further progress.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 167-176 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Dyslexia |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Aug 2003 |