Science: an unreliable friend to environmental education?

M. Ashley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article focuses upon the uneasy relationship between science and environmental education. It argues that science probably offers the strongest justification for the adoption of pro-environmental behaviours and policies, but that the relationship between science and environmentalism is strained by conflicts over fundamental values that are apparent in interpretation of the precautionary principle. An understanding of risk and scientific uncertainty is seen as an essential element of citizenship education for a sustainable society. Curriculum design needs to respond to the challenges of living in a risk society. The article argues for changes to the curriculum which lead to a scientific action competence founded in an understanding of the limits of science and an appreciation of the fact that scientists are moral agents who face ethical dilemmas in their work.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)265-276
JournalEnvironmental Education Research
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

environmental education
science
risk society
curriculum
environmental behavior
environmental policy
citizenship
uncertainty
interpretation
Values
education

Cite this

@article{4e93d76cae5547dfb93fa5e696282664,
title = "Science: an unreliable friend to environmental education?",
abstract = "This article focuses upon the uneasy relationship between science and environmental education. It argues that science probably offers the strongest justification for the adoption of pro-environmental behaviours and policies, but that the relationship between science and environmentalism is strained by conflicts over fundamental values that are apparent in interpretation of the precautionary principle. An understanding of risk and scientific uncertainty is seen as an essential element of citizenship education for a sustainable society. Curriculum design needs to respond to the challenges of living in a risk society. The article argues for changes to the curriculum which lead to a scientific action competence founded in an understanding of the limits of science and an appreciation of the fact that scientists are moral agents who face ethical dilemmas in their work.",
author = "M. Ashley",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1080/713664678",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "265--276",
journal = "Environmental Education Research",
issn = "1469-5871",
publisher = "Carfax Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Science: an unreliable friend to environmental education? / Ashley, M.

In: Environmental Education Research, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2000, p. 265-276.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Science: an unreliable friend to environmental education?

AU - Ashley, M.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - This article focuses upon the uneasy relationship between science and environmental education. It argues that science probably offers the strongest justification for the adoption of pro-environmental behaviours and policies, but that the relationship between science and environmentalism is strained by conflicts over fundamental values that are apparent in interpretation of the precautionary principle. An understanding of risk and scientific uncertainty is seen as an essential element of citizenship education for a sustainable society. Curriculum design needs to respond to the challenges of living in a risk society. The article argues for changes to the curriculum which lead to a scientific action competence founded in an understanding of the limits of science and an appreciation of the fact that scientists are moral agents who face ethical dilemmas in their work.

AB - This article focuses upon the uneasy relationship between science and environmental education. It argues that science probably offers the strongest justification for the adoption of pro-environmental behaviours and policies, but that the relationship between science and environmentalism is strained by conflicts over fundamental values that are apparent in interpretation of the precautionary principle. An understanding of risk and scientific uncertainty is seen as an essential element of citizenship education for a sustainable society. Curriculum design needs to respond to the challenges of living in a risk society. The article argues for changes to the curriculum which lead to a scientific action competence founded in an understanding of the limits of science and an appreciation of the fact that scientists are moral agents who face ethical dilemmas in their work.

U2 - 10.1080/713664678

DO - 10.1080/713664678

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 265

EP - 276

JO - Environmental Education Research

JF - Environmental Education Research

SN - 1469-5871

IS - 3

ER -