Risk, prevention and early intervention: youth justice responses to girls

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the paper is to examine the discourses of risk, prevention and early intervention, with particular reference, the treatment of girls in the contemporary Youth Justice System. Design: The paper has two broad objectives: firstly, the paper reviews the literature on early intervention and youth crime prevention policy. Secondly, the paper focuses on youth justice practice in relation to girls who are engaged in youth justice processes or “at risk” of criminal involvement. Findings: The paper argues that: girls are drawn into the system for welfare rather than crime-related matters; and youth justice policy and practice seems to negate girls’ gender-specific needs. Moreover, the paper highlights research evidence and practice-based experience, and contends that youth justice policy and practice must be re-developed in favour of incorporating gender-specific, child and young person centred practices. Value: The results presented in this article will be particularly pertinent to policy makers, educators and practitioners in the sphere of youth justice, especially since the contemporary youth justice system, in its rigorous, actuarial pursuance of risk management, fails to distinguish between “gender” within its formulaic assessment documentation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)111-120
JournalSafer Communities
Volume11
Issue number2
Early online date30 Apr 2012
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 30 Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Social Justice
justice
Crime
welfare
offense
educator
discourse
gender
Research
evidence
Values
experience

Cite this

@article{cb10f104562149c78e79523aeef540b7,
title = "Risk, prevention and early intervention: youth justice responses to girls",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of the paper is to examine the discourses of risk, prevention and early intervention, with particular reference, the treatment of girls in the contemporary Youth Justice System. Design: The paper has two broad objectives: firstly, the paper reviews the literature on early intervention and youth crime prevention policy. Secondly, the paper focuses on youth justice practice in relation to girls who are engaged in youth justice processes or “at risk” of criminal involvement. Findings: The paper argues that: girls are drawn into the system for welfare rather than crime-related matters; and youth justice policy and practice seems to negate girls’ gender-specific needs. Moreover, the paper highlights research evidence and practice-based experience, and contends that youth justice policy and practice must be re-developed in favour of incorporating gender-specific, child and young person centred practices. Value: The results presented in this article will be particularly pertinent to policy makers, educators and practitioners in the sphere of youth justice, especially since the contemporary youth justice system, in its rigorous, actuarial pursuance of risk management, fails to distinguish between “gender” within its formulaic assessment documentation.",
author = "Sean Creaney",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1108/17578041211215348",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "111--120",
journal = "Safer Communities",
issn = "1757-8043",
publisher = "Emerald",
number = "2",

}

Risk, prevention and early intervention: youth justice responses to girls. / Creaney, Sean.

In: Safer Communities, Vol. 11, No. 2, 30.04.2012, p. 111-120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk, prevention and early intervention: youth justice responses to girls

AU - Creaney, Sean

PY - 2012/4/30

Y1 - 2012/4/30

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of the paper is to examine the discourses of risk, prevention and early intervention, with particular reference, the treatment of girls in the contemporary Youth Justice System. Design: The paper has two broad objectives: firstly, the paper reviews the literature on early intervention and youth crime prevention policy. Secondly, the paper focuses on youth justice practice in relation to girls who are engaged in youth justice processes or “at risk” of criminal involvement. Findings: The paper argues that: girls are drawn into the system for welfare rather than crime-related matters; and youth justice policy and practice seems to negate girls’ gender-specific needs. Moreover, the paper highlights research evidence and practice-based experience, and contends that youth justice policy and practice must be re-developed in favour of incorporating gender-specific, child and young person centred practices. Value: The results presented in this article will be particularly pertinent to policy makers, educators and practitioners in the sphere of youth justice, especially since the contemporary youth justice system, in its rigorous, actuarial pursuance of risk management, fails to distinguish between “gender” within its formulaic assessment documentation.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of the paper is to examine the discourses of risk, prevention and early intervention, with particular reference, the treatment of girls in the contemporary Youth Justice System. Design: The paper has two broad objectives: firstly, the paper reviews the literature on early intervention and youth crime prevention policy. Secondly, the paper focuses on youth justice practice in relation to girls who are engaged in youth justice processes or “at risk” of criminal involvement. Findings: The paper argues that: girls are drawn into the system for welfare rather than crime-related matters; and youth justice policy and practice seems to negate girls’ gender-specific needs. Moreover, the paper highlights research evidence and practice-based experience, and contends that youth justice policy and practice must be re-developed in favour of incorporating gender-specific, child and young person centred practices. Value: The results presented in this article will be particularly pertinent to policy makers, educators and practitioners in the sphere of youth justice, especially since the contemporary youth justice system, in its rigorous, actuarial pursuance of risk management, fails to distinguish between “gender” within its formulaic assessment documentation.

U2 - 10.1108/17578041211215348

DO - 10.1108/17578041211215348

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 111

EP - 120

JO - Safer Communities

JF - Safer Communities

SN - 1757-8043

IS - 2

ER -