Rich contexts do not always enrich the accuracy of personality judgments

Helen J Wall, Paul J Taylor, John Dixon, Stacey M Conchie, David A Ellis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (journal)peer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)


We test the common assumption that information ‘rich’ contexts lead to more accurate personality judgments than information ‘lean’ contexts. Pairs of unacquainted students rendered judgments of one another's personalities after interacting in one of three, increasingly rich, contexts: Internet ‘chat’, telephone, or face-to-face. Accuracy was assessed by correlating participants' judgments with a measure of targets' personalities that averaged self and informant ratings. As predicted, the visible traits of extraversion and conscientiousness were judged more accurately than the less visible traits of neuroticism and openness. However, judgment accuracy also depended on context. Judgments of extraversion and neuroticism improved as context richness increased (i.e., from Internet ‘chat’ to face-to-face), whereas judgments of conscientiousness and openness improved as context richness decreased (i.e., from face-to-face to Internet ‘chat’). Our findings suggest that context richness shapes not only the availability of personality cues but also the relevance of cues in any given context.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1190-1195
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 30 May 2013


Dive into the research topics of 'Rich contexts do not always enrich the accuracy of personality judgments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this