Rhetorics of Species Revivalism and Biotechnology: A Roundtable Dialogue

Eva Kasprzycka*, Charlotte Wrigley, Searle Adam, RICHARD TWINE

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (journal)peer-review

16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This informal dialogue contextualises and explores contemporary practices of nonhuman animal gene-modification in de-extinction projects. Looking at recent developments in biotechnology’s role in de-extinction sciences and industries, these interdisciplinary scholars scrutinise the neoliberal impetus driving ‘species revivalism’ in the wake of the Capitalocene. Critical examinations of species integrity, cryo-preservation, techno-optimism, rewilding initiatives and projects aimed at restoring extinct animals such as the woolly mammoth and bucardo are used to map some of the necessary restructuring of conservation policies and enterprises that could secure viably sustainable —and just—futures for nonhuman animals at risk of extinction. Authors question what alternatives are being ignored in the wake of technoscientific responses to the climate emergency and interpret the motivations, tactics and tools responsible for commodifying nonhuman animals down to the cellular level. Our conversation on the messy relations within endangered ecologies offers alternative strategies and approaches to how environmental governance addresses the climate and biodiversity crises today.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)190-219
Number of pages32
JournalAnimal Studies Journal
Volume12
Issue number2
Early online date18 Dec 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Dec 2023

Keywords

  • animals
  • biotechnology
  • species revivalism
  • de-extinction
  • gene-modification
  • animal ethics
  • extinction
  • climate change
  • technology
  • conservation

Research Centres

  • Centre for Human Animal Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rhetorics of Species Revivalism and Biotechnology: A Roundtable Dialogue'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this