Review of the state anti-corruption institutions effectiveness in Ukraine

  • Olha Bondarenko
  • , MARYNA UTKINA
  • , Mykhailo Dumchikov
  • , Daria Prokofieva-Yanchylenko
  • , Kateryna Yanishevska

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (journal)peer-review

Abstract

The objective of the article is a review of the state anti-corruption institutions' effectiveness in
Ukraine. An important part of anti-corruption reform in Ukraine has been the complete transformation of anti-corruption institutions. That is why the authors try to use the most optimal methodology that would be able to ensure the comprehensiveness and completeness of the study: phenomenological; the descriptive; the hypothetic-deductive; the statistical; and the
method of case law analysis. It is proposed to analyze the anti-corruption powers of general competence authorities in the sphere of anti-corruption. The authors analyzed the powers of specialized anti-corruption authorities' functioning: the National Agency on Corruption Prevention; the National Anti Corruption Bureau; the National Agency for finding, tracing, and management of assets derived from corruption and other crimes; the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office and the High Anti-Corruption Court. The conclusion is drawn that, realizing the need
of the anti-corruption task, the state has developed an extensive and relatively closed
system of specialized anti-corruption authorities. Almost all bodies of state power and local selfgovernment have acquired certain anticorruption competencies. The authors made conclusion that such dispersion of powers, and in some cases their duplication, does not simplify,
but rather complicates the effectiveness of combating corruption.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)219-233
JournalRevista Amazonia Investiga
Volume10
Issue number38
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Apr 2021

Keywords

  • anti-corruption legislation
  • corruption prevention
  • anti-corruption actors

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Review of the state anti-corruption institutions effectiveness in Ukraine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this