Review of "Language in the British Isles" ed. by D Britain

C. Grey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

pronoun of sorts), the parallelism becomes quite obvious. For Boeckx, piedpiping is a mirror image of resumption. The moved element, instead of being completely dissociated from the island due to the presence of the resumptive element inside the island, drags the entire island with it. Thus it does not enter into new checking relationships. In conclusion, Boeckx’s Bare syntax offers a fresh and stimulating perspective on core issues in current syntactic theory, and proposes a unified approach to a number of seemingly non-unifiable phenomena. Its empirical strength lies in breadth rather than depth. A reader looking for a detailed indepth examination of one empirical domain (or a small set of related ones) might leave a little disappointed. A reader looking for inspiration on how to connect a range of relatively well-known phenomena in intriguing new ways will leave quite inspired.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)446-450
JournalJournal of Linguistics
Volume45
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

syntax
examination
language
British Isles
Language
Reader
Parallelism
Resumption
Pronoun
Syntactic Theory
Syntax

Cite this

Grey, C. / Review of "Language in the British Isles" ed. by D Britain. In: Journal of Linguistics. 2009 ; Vol. 45, No. 2. pp. 446-450.
@article{d01867852b184b2499f23ac92a05b486,
title = "Review of {"}Language in the British Isles{"} ed. by D Britain",
abstract = "pronoun of sorts), the parallelism becomes quite obvious. For Boeckx, piedpiping is a mirror image of resumption. The moved element, instead of being completely dissociated from the island due to the presence of the resumptive element inside the island, drags the entire island with it. Thus it does not enter into new checking relationships. In conclusion, Boeckx’s Bare syntax offers a fresh and stimulating perspective on core issues in current syntactic theory, and proposes a unified approach to a number of seemingly non-unifiable phenomena. Its empirical strength lies in breadth rather than depth. A reader looking for a detailed indepth examination of one empirical domain (or a small set of related ones) might leave a little disappointed. A reader looking for inspiration on how to connect a range of relatively well-known phenomena in intriguing new ways will leave quite inspired.",
author = "C. Grey",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "446--450",
journal = "Journal of Linguistics",
issn = "0022-2267",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

Review of "Language in the British Isles" ed. by D Britain. / Grey, C.

In: Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 45, No. 2, 2009, p. 446-450.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Review of "Language in the British Isles" ed. by D Britain

AU - Grey, C.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - pronoun of sorts), the parallelism becomes quite obvious. For Boeckx, piedpiping is a mirror image of resumption. The moved element, instead of being completely dissociated from the island due to the presence of the resumptive element inside the island, drags the entire island with it. Thus it does not enter into new checking relationships. In conclusion, Boeckx’s Bare syntax offers a fresh and stimulating perspective on core issues in current syntactic theory, and proposes a unified approach to a number of seemingly non-unifiable phenomena. Its empirical strength lies in breadth rather than depth. A reader looking for a detailed indepth examination of one empirical domain (or a small set of related ones) might leave a little disappointed. A reader looking for inspiration on how to connect a range of relatively well-known phenomena in intriguing new ways will leave quite inspired.

AB - pronoun of sorts), the parallelism becomes quite obvious. For Boeckx, piedpiping is a mirror image of resumption. The moved element, instead of being completely dissociated from the island due to the presence of the resumptive element inside the island, drags the entire island with it. Thus it does not enter into new checking relationships. In conclusion, Boeckx’s Bare syntax offers a fresh and stimulating perspective on core issues in current syntactic theory, and proposes a unified approach to a number of seemingly non-unifiable phenomena. Its empirical strength lies in breadth rather than depth. A reader looking for a detailed indepth examination of one empirical domain (or a small set of related ones) might leave a little disappointed. A reader looking for inspiration on how to connect a range of relatively well-known phenomena in intriguing new ways will leave quite inspired.

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 446

EP - 450

JO - Journal of Linguistics

JF - Journal of Linguistics

SN - 0022-2267

IS - 2

ER -