Researching Drinking ‘with’ Young People: A Palette of Methods

Samantha Wilkinson, Catherine Wilkinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)
9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: This paper outlines a study characterised by ‘pockets’ of co-production and argues for the benefits of offering young people a palette of interdisciplinary methods to ‘opt into’, giving participants the opportunity to discuss their drinking practices and experiences ‘on their own terms’. Design/methodology/approach: 40 young people, aged 15-24, from the suburban case study locations of Chorlton and Wythenshawe, Manchester, UK, were recruited for multi-stage qualitative research. Participants were presented with a suite of both long-standing and innovative methods that they could ‘opt into’, including: interviews, peer interviews, diaries, mobile phone interviews, text messaging and participant observation. Findings: This paper shows that both long-standing and innovative methods have their own individual strengths for researching into young people’s alcohol consumption practices and experiences. Yet, each of the methods utilised in this study also had specific drawbacks for researching substance use. Offering a palette of methods for participants to ‘opt into’ was thus beneficial in: offsetting the weaknesses of other methods; triangulating the study findings; and enabling participants to communicate with the researcher in culturally credible ways. Research limitations/implications: Practical implications: Social implications: Originality/value: By offering an honest account about the successes and failures of deploying a range of methods when exploring young people’s drinking practices and experiences, this paper is valuable for researchers in, and beyond, the field of substance use, seeking to broaden their methodological toolkit.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6-16
JournalDrugs and Alcohol Today
Volume18
Issue number1
Early online date27 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 27 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

Drinking
Interviews
Research Personnel
Text Messaging
Cell Phones
Qualitative Research
Alcohol Drinking
Observation
Research

Keywords

  • Alcohol
  • Co-production
  • Drinking
  • Participatory Methods
  • Qualitative Research
  • 27 Young People.

Cite this

Wilkinson, Samantha ; Wilkinson, Catherine. / Researching Drinking ‘with’ Young People: A Palette of Methods. In: Drugs and Alcohol Today. 2018 ; Vol. 18, No. 1. pp. 6-16.
@article{a9deca7924234fd6a6d7a7ae872c786e,
title = "Researching Drinking ‘with’ Young People: A Palette of Methods",
abstract = "Purpose: This paper outlines a study characterised by ‘pockets’ of co-production and argues for the benefits of offering young people a palette of interdisciplinary methods to ‘opt into’, giving participants the opportunity to discuss their drinking practices and experiences ‘on their own terms’. Design/methodology/approach: 40 young people, aged 15-24, from the suburban case study locations of Chorlton and Wythenshawe, Manchester, UK, were recruited for multi-stage qualitative research. Participants were presented with a suite of both long-standing and innovative methods that they could ‘opt into’, including: interviews, peer interviews, diaries, mobile phone interviews, text messaging and participant observation. Findings: This paper shows that both long-standing and innovative methods have their own individual strengths for researching into young people’s alcohol consumption practices and experiences. Yet, each of the methods utilised in this study also had specific drawbacks for researching substance use. Offering a palette of methods for participants to ‘opt into’ was thus beneficial in: offsetting the weaknesses of other methods; triangulating the study findings; and enabling participants to communicate with the researcher in culturally credible ways. Research limitations/implications: Practical implications: Social implications: Originality/value: By offering an honest account about the successes and failures of deploying a range of methods when exploring young people’s drinking practices and experiences, this paper is valuable for researchers in, and beyond, the field of substance use, seeking to broaden their methodological toolkit.",
keywords = "Alcohol, Co-production, Drinking, Participatory Methods, Qualitative Research, 27 Young People.",
author = "Samantha Wilkinson and Catherine Wilkinson",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "27",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1108/DAT-08-2017-0036",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "6--16",
journal = "Drugs and Alcohol Today",
issn = "1745-9265",
publisher = "Emerald",
number = "1",

}

Researching Drinking ‘with’ Young People: A Palette of Methods. / Wilkinson, Samantha; Wilkinson, Catherine.

In: Drugs and Alcohol Today, Vol. 18, No. 1, 27.03.2018, p. 6-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Researching Drinking ‘with’ Young People: A Palette of Methods

AU - Wilkinson, Samantha

AU - Wilkinson, Catherine

PY - 2018/3/27

Y1 - 2018/3/27

N2 - Purpose: This paper outlines a study characterised by ‘pockets’ of co-production and argues for the benefits of offering young people a palette of interdisciplinary methods to ‘opt into’, giving participants the opportunity to discuss their drinking practices and experiences ‘on their own terms’. Design/methodology/approach: 40 young people, aged 15-24, from the suburban case study locations of Chorlton and Wythenshawe, Manchester, UK, were recruited for multi-stage qualitative research. Participants were presented with a suite of both long-standing and innovative methods that they could ‘opt into’, including: interviews, peer interviews, diaries, mobile phone interviews, text messaging and participant observation. Findings: This paper shows that both long-standing and innovative methods have their own individual strengths for researching into young people’s alcohol consumption practices and experiences. Yet, each of the methods utilised in this study also had specific drawbacks for researching substance use. Offering a palette of methods for participants to ‘opt into’ was thus beneficial in: offsetting the weaknesses of other methods; triangulating the study findings; and enabling participants to communicate with the researcher in culturally credible ways. Research limitations/implications: Practical implications: Social implications: Originality/value: By offering an honest account about the successes and failures of deploying a range of methods when exploring young people’s drinking practices and experiences, this paper is valuable for researchers in, and beyond, the field of substance use, seeking to broaden their methodological toolkit.

AB - Purpose: This paper outlines a study characterised by ‘pockets’ of co-production and argues for the benefits of offering young people a palette of interdisciplinary methods to ‘opt into’, giving participants the opportunity to discuss their drinking practices and experiences ‘on their own terms’. Design/methodology/approach: 40 young people, aged 15-24, from the suburban case study locations of Chorlton and Wythenshawe, Manchester, UK, were recruited for multi-stage qualitative research. Participants were presented with a suite of both long-standing and innovative methods that they could ‘opt into’, including: interviews, peer interviews, diaries, mobile phone interviews, text messaging and participant observation. Findings: This paper shows that both long-standing and innovative methods have their own individual strengths for researching into young people’s alcohol consumption practices and experiences. Yet, each of the methods utilised in this study also had specific drawbacks for researching substance use. Offering a palette of methods for participants to ‘opt into’ was thus beneficial in: offsetting the weaknesses of other methods; triangulating the study findings; and enabling participants to communicate with the researcher in culturally credible ways. Research limitations/implications: Practical implications: Social implications: Originality/value: By offering an honest account about the successes and failures of deploying a range of methods when exploring young people’s drinking practices and experiences, this paper is valuable for researchers in, and beyond, the field of substance use, seeking to broaden their methodological toolkit.

KW - Alcohol

KW - Co-production

KW - Drinking

KW - Participatory Methods

KW - Qualitative Research

KW - 27 Young People.

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1108/DAT-08-2017-0036

DO - https://doi.org/10.1108/DAT-08-2017-0036

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 6

EP - 16

JO - Drugs and Alcohol Today

JF - Drugs and Alcohol Today

SN - 1745-9265

IS - 1

ER -