TY - JOUR
T1 - Research priorities relating to the delivery of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation programmes
T2 - Results of a modified Delphi process
AU - McHale, Sheona
AU - Cowie, Aynsley
AU - Brown, Sarah
AU - Butler, Tom
AU - Carver, Kathryn
AU - Dalal, Hasnain M.
AU - Dawkes, Susan
AU - Deighan, Carolyn
AU - Doherty, Patrick
AU - Evans, Jo
AU - Hinton, Sally
AU - Jones, Jennifer
AU - Mills, Joseph
AU - Nichols, Simon
AU - Taylor, Rod S.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the British Heart Foundation Clinical Research Collaborative.
Funding Information:
The British Heart Foundation Clinical Research Collaborative (BHF-CRC) has been established to provide a forum for research collaborations across the cardiovascular disease societies of the UK which are affiliated with the British Cardiovascular Society. Committed to advancing research within the field of CVPR, the BACPR established a clinical study group (CSG) to work as part of the BHF-CRC. From the outset, this CSG agreed that its first task would be to undertake a project to establish research priorities within the field of CVPR. This project idea was fully supported by, and received funding from, the BHF-CRC.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Author(s). Published by BMJ.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2023/4/3
Y1 - 2023/4/3
N2 - Objective The purpose of this British Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (BACPR) research priority setting project (PSP) was to identify a top 10 list of priority research questions for cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation (CVPR). Methods The PSP was facilitated by the BACPR clinical study group (CSG), which integrates as part of the British Heart Foundation Clinical Research Collaborative. Following a literature review to identify unanswered research questions, modified Delphi methods were used to engage CVPR-informed expert stakeholders, patients, partners and conference delegates in ranking the relevance of research questions during three rounds of an anonymous e-survey. In the first survey, unanswered questions from the literature review were ranked and respondents proposed additional questions. In the second survey, these new questions were ranked. Prioritised questions from surveys 1 and 2 were incorporated in a third/final e-survey used to identify the top 10 list. Results From 459 responses across the global CVPR community, a final top 10 list of questions were distilled from an overall bank of 76 (61 from the current evidence base and a further 15 from respondents). These were grouped across five broad categories: access and remote delivery, exercise and physical activity, optimising programme outcomes, psychosocial health and impact of the pandemic. Conclusions This PSP used a modified Delphi methodology to engage the international CVPR community to generate a top 10 list of research priorities within the field. These prioritised questions will directly inform future national and international CVPR research supported by the BACPR CSG.
AB - Objective The purpose of this British Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (BACPR) research priority setting project (PSP) was to identify a top 10 list of priority research questions for cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation (CVPR). Methods The PSP was facilitated by the BACPR clinical study group (CSG), which integrates as part of the British Heart Foundation Clinical Research Collaborative. Following a literature review to identify unanswered research questions, modified Delphi methods were used to engage CVPR-informed expert stakeholders, patients, partners and conference delegates in ranking the relevance of research questions during three rounds of an anonymous e-survey. In the first survey, unanswered questions from the literature review were ranked and respondents proposed additional questions. In the second survey, these new questions were ranked. Prioritised questions from surveys 1 and 2 were incorporated in a third/final e-survey used to identify the top 10 list. Results From 459 responses across the global CVPR community, a final top 10 list of questions were distilled from an overall bank of 76 (61 from the current evidence base and a further 15 from respondents). These were grouped across five broad categories: access and remote delivery, exercise and physical activity, optimising programme outcomes, psychosocial health and impact of the pandemic. Conclusions This PSP used a modified Delphi methodology to engage the international CVPR community to generate a top 10 list of research priorities within the field. These prioritised questions will directly inform future national and international CVPR research supported by the BACPR CSG.
KW - CARDIAC REHABILITATION
KW - COVID-19
KW - RISK FACTORS
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85152787812&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85152787812&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002248
DO - 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002248
M3 - Article (journal)
C2 - 37012072
AN - SCOPUS:85152787812
SN - 2398-595X
VL - 10
JO - Open Heart
JF - Open Heart
IS - 1
M1 - e002248
ER -