Relationships between Gatekeepers and Researchers: The Experience of Conducting Evaluations into Parenting Programmes in Community and Penal Settings

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

3 Citations (Scopus)
12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This chapter discusses the often problematic process of gaining and sustaining access to individuals or groups via institutions when conducting criminological research. The chapter will consider issues of power, ethics and hierarchy in conducting research with so-called vulnerable populations, namely those incarcerated and those subject to criminal justice sanctions in the community. The chapter discusses the pluralistic nature of the gatekeeper-researcher relationship and asks whether gatekeepers are the most appropriate people to decide whether others should take part in research, highlighting the very real tensions between the powerless and the powerful.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationReflexivity in Criminological Research: Experiences with the Powerful and the Powerless
EditorsK Lumsden, A Winter
Place of PublicationBasingstoke
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages35-46
ISBN (Print)9781137379399
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Oct 2014

Fingerprint

gatekeeper
evaluation
community
experience
sanction
justice
moral philosophy
Group

Cite this

Davies, J., & Peters, E. (2014). Relationships between Gatekeepers and Researchers: The Experience of Conducting Evaluations into Parenting Programmes in Community and Penal Settings. In K. Lumsden, & A. Winter (Eds.), Reflexivity in Criminological Research: Experiences with the Powerful and the Powerless (pp. 35-46). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137379405
Davies, Julie ; Peters, Eleanor. / Relationships between Gatekeepers and Researchers: The Experience of Conducting Evaluations into Parenting Programmes in Community and Penal Settings. Reflexivity in Criminological Research: Experiences with the Powerful and the Powerless. editor / K Lumsden ; A Winter. Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. pp. 35-46
@inbook{3da7279f151e42e98fd6624a354e6b5f,
title = "Relationships between Gatekeepers and Researchers: The Experience of Conducting Evaluations into Parenting Programmes in Community and Penal Settings",
abstract = "This chapter discusses the often problematic process of gaining and sustaining access to individuals or groups via institutions when conducting criminological research. The chapter will consider issues of power, ethics and hierarchy in conducting research with so-called vulnerable populations, namely those incarcerated and those subject to criminal justice sanctions in the community. The chapter discusses the pluralistic nature of the gatekeeper-researcher relationship and asks whether gatekeepers are the most appropriate people to decide whether others should take part in research, highlighting the very real tensions between the powerless and the powerful.",
author = "Julie Davies and Eleanor Peters",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1057/9781137379405",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781137379399",
pages = "35--46",
editor = "K Lumsden and A Winter",
booktitle = "Reflexivity in Criminological Research: Experiences with the Powerful and the Powerless",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",

}

Davies, J & Peters, E 2014, Relationships between Gatekeepers and Researchers: The Experience of Conducting Evaluations into Parenting Programmes in Community and Penal Settings. in K Lumsden & A Winter (eds), Reflexivity in Criminological Research: Experiences with the Powerful and the Powerless. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137379405

Relationships between Gatekeepers and Researchers: The Experience of Conducting Evaluations into Parenting Programmes in Community and Penal Settings. / Davies, Julie; Peters, Eleanor.

Reflexivity in Criminological Research: Experiences with the Powerful and the Powerless. ed. / K Lumsden; A Winter. Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. p. 35-46.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Relationships between Gatekeepers and Researchers: The Experience of Conducting Evaluations into Parenting Programmes in Community and Penal Settings

AU - Davies, Julie

AU - Peters, Eleanor

PY - 2014/10/8

Y1 - 2014/10/8

N2 - This chapter discusses the often problematic process of gaining and sustaining access to individuals or groups via institutions when conducting criminological research. The chapter will consider issues of power, ethics and hierarchy in conducting research with so-called vulnerable populations, namely those incarcerated and those subject to criminal justice sanctions in the community. The chapter discusses the pluralistic nature of the gatekeeper-researcher relationship and asks whether gatekeepers are the most appropriate people to decide whether others should take part in research, highlighting the very real tensions between the powerless and the powerful.

AB - This chapter discusses the often problematic process of gaining and sustaining access to individuals or groups via institutions when conducting criminological research. The chapter will consider issues of power, ethics and hierarchy in conducting research with so-called vulnerable populations, namely those incarcerated and those subject to criminal justice sanctions in the community. The chapter discusses the pluralistic nature of the gatekeeper-researcher relationship and asks whether gatekeepers are the most appropriate people to decide whether others should take part in research, highlighting the very real tensions between the powerless and the powerful.

UR - http://www.palgraveconnect.com/pc/index.html

U2 - 10.1057/9781137379405

DO - 10.1057/9781137379405

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781137379399

SP - 35

EP - 46

BT - Reflexivity in Criminological Research: Experiences with the Powerful and the Powerless

A2 - Lumsden, K

A2 - Winter, A

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

CY - Basingstoke

ER -

Davies J, Peters E. Relationships between Gatekeepers and Researchers: The Experience of Conducting Evaluations into Parenting Programmes in Community and Penal Settings. In Lumsden K, Winter A, editors, Reflexivity in Criminological Research: Experiences with the Powerful and the Powerless. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 2014. p. 35-46 https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137379405