TY - JOUR
T1 - Reimagining Children’s Behaviour and Behaviour Management ‘Otherwise’:
T2 - A Critical Commentary on the English Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS)
AU - Hester, Sally
AU - Moran, Lisa
AU - Richards, Elizabeth
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Child Care in Practice Group.
PY - 2021/3/23
Y1 - 2021/3/23
N2 - This paper focuses on the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS), which sets standards for children’s care, development and education in England from birth to five years old. Analysing the EYFS, as comprised of knowledge and discourses that inform, and are informed by broader cultural understandings of childhood and development, we argue that the way in which the current EYFS (2017) frames young children’s behaviour promotes largely instrumental strategies for behaviour management which perpetuate overly static understandings of childhood and children’s development and promote neo-liberal ideals that might be said to be detrimental to children’s rights and their overall well-being. Importantly, we argue that the EYFS imposes discourses about responsibility for managing one’s own behaviour on young children which simultaneously overlook the multidimensionality of children’s lives and contradict other aspects of the EYFS and English early years policy. The paper makes suggestions about how the EYFS can be reimagined ‘otherwise’ using the lens of governmentality, exposing power relations and the production of taken-for-granted ‘truths’ about children’s realities that appear in contemporary policies.
AB - This paper focuses on the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS), which sets standards for children’s care, development and education in England from birth to five years old. Analysing the EYFS, as comprised of knowledge and discourses that inform, and are informed by broader cultural understandings of childhood and development, we argue that the way in which the current EYFS (2017) frames young children’s behaviour promotes largely instrumental strategies for behaviour management which perpetuate overly static understandings of childhood and children’s development and promote neo-liberal ideals that might be said to be detrimental to children’s rights and their overall well-being. Importantly, we argue that the EYFS imposes discourses about responsibility for managing one’s own behaviour on young children which simultaneously overlook the multidimensionality of children’s lives and contradict other aspects of the EYFS and English early years policy. The paper makes suggestions about how the EYFS can be reimagined ‘otherwise’ using the lens of governmentality, exposing power relations and the production of taken-for-granted ‘truths’ about children’s realities that appear in contemporary policies.
KW - Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS)
KW - Early Years Education
KW - Behaviour Management
KW - behaviour
KW - Children
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102958553&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102958553&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13575279.2021.1895075
DO - 10.1080/13575279.2021.1895075
M3 - Article (journal)
SN - 1357-5279
SP - 1
EP - 16
JO - Child Care in Practice
JF - Child Care in Practice
ER -