Abstract
Based on focus group discussions of self-generated photographs of individuals aged 19–67 resident in urban Northwest England, this article examines the health narratives of men facing disadvantage because of economic hardship and/or mental health difficulty (mhd). In contrast to stereotypes of men as uncomfortable with emotions linked to vulnerability, we explore how such men can develop within self-help groups the kind of emotional resources that encourage health-seeking behaviours. Our argument contrasts with theories that risk denying/diminishing working-class men's emotional reflexivity or that frame reflexivity (thought on feelings and behaviour to effect life changes) as individualised and more available to middle-class (younger) men. We argue that participant accounts indicate development of more collective emotional and epistemic resources from a position of subordinated masculinity. This argument challenges stereotypes of working-class men as lacking in knowledge/skill in health and self-care. Collective reflexivity over health/wellbeing was particularly visible in three main accounts that emerged during focus groups: involvement in self-help ‘communities of practice’, use of local aesthetic spaces and negotiation with/qualified challenge to healthy eating discourse.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 900-916 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Sociology of Health and Illness |
Volume | 41 |
Issue number | 5 |
Early online date | 20 Feb 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2019 |
Keywords
- Disadvantaged men
- Emotions
- health
- Mental Health
- Reflexivity
- emotions
- mental health
- reflexivity
- disadvantaged men
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reflexivity Denied? The Emotional and Health-Seeking Resources of Men Facing Disadvantage.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Dr MICHAEL RICHARDS
- Allied Health, Social Work & Wellbeing - SL in Applied Health and Social Care
Person: Academic