Abstract
Created following the amalgamation of several individual subject disciplines, in England, design and technology is in decline. Debates about its purpose and position have taken place since its inception but arguably these have not transferred into a rigorous research base. There is a growing body of scholars exploring the field, but with the decline of the subject, so the community working and investigating it is also diminished. Without a strong foundation, the actions of the few may not carry sufficient weight to generate full and meaningful debate that would influence those with the power to change policy on curriculum and lead to innovation.
If we are to have any hope of reversing the subject’s deterioration, we must do something bold and significant. While an awareness of the subject’s history and its evolution is integral to our understanding of how and why we are where we are, merely reflecting on the past will do little to help the subject move forward. Hence, the principal aim of our research is to explore what a re-designed design and technology could look like. To achieve this, this study draws on different stakeholders’ visions of how they perceive the subject’s future.
Theoretical underpinning of this work is derived from abductive grounded theory, which aligns with the researcher’s individual ontological positions. Drawing together the findings from participants, this paper presents outcomes in the form of a ‘living document’. We see this as the first phase in an ongoing study into the future of the subject. Findings indicate a diverse range of opinion relating to the subject’s future. Following analysis, outcomes are discussed, and future steps to re-imagine the subject are then explored.
If we are to have any hope of reversing the subject’s deterioration, we must do something bold and significant. While an awareness of the subject’s history and its evolution is integral to our understanding of how and why we are where we are, merely reflecting on the past will do little to help the subject move forward. Hence, the principal aim of our research is to explore what a re-designed design and technology could look like. To achieve this, this study draws on different stakeholders’ visions of how they perceive the subject’s future.
Theoretical underpinning of this work is derived from abductive grounded theory, which aligns with the researcher’s individual ontological positions. Drawing together the findings from participants, this paper presents outcomes in the form of a ‘living document’. We see this as the first phase in an ongoing study into the future of the subject. Findings indicate a diverse range of opinion relating to the subject’s future. Following analysis, outcomes are discussed, and future steps to re-imagine the subject are then explored.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings PATT37: Developing a knowledge economy through technology and engineering education |
| Subtitle of host publication | Department of Technology and Entrepreneurship Education |
| Editors | Sarah Pule, Marc de Vries |
| Place of Publication | University of Malta, Msida, Malta |
| Publisher | University of Malta |
| Pages | 233-249 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9 789995 714796 |
| Publication status | Published - 3 Jun 2019 |
| Event | PATT37 : Developing a knowledge economy through technology and engineering education - University of Malta, Msida, Malta Duration: 3 Jun 2019 → 6 Jun 2019 https://www.um.edu.mt/events/patt2019 |
Conference
| Conference | PATT37 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | Malta |
| City | Msida |
| Period | 3/06/19 → 6/06/19 |
| Internet address |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- Curriculum change
- Curriculum design
- Curriculum innovation
- Design and Technology
- Living Document
- STEM
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Re-designing Design and Technology Education: A living literature review of stakeholder perspectives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.-
How technology makes us human: cultural historical roots for design and technology education
McLain, M., IRVING-BELL, D., WOOFF, D. & Morrison-Love, D., 2 Oct 2019, In: Curriculum Journal. 30, 4, p. 464-483 20 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (journal) › peer-review
Open AccessFile18 Link opens in a new tab Citations (Scopus)109 Downloads (Pure) -
Humanising the design and technology curriculum: Why technology education makes us human
McLain, M., Irving-Bell, D., Wooff, D. & Morrison-Love, D., 1 Jul 2019, In: Design and Technology Education: An International Journal. 24, 2, p. 8-19 12 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (journal) › peer-review
Open AccessFile -
Re-designing Design and Technology Education: A living literature review of stakeholder perspectives: PATT37 Conference Presentation
IRVING-BELL, D., WOOFF, D. & McLain, M., 3 Jun 2019.Research output: Contribution to conference › Lecture › peer-review
Open AccessFile
-
Pupils Attitude Towards Technology (PATT) 39 (External organisation)
Irving-Bell, D. (Member)
21 Jun 2022 → 24 Jun 2022Activity: Membership › Membership of local authority committee/ group
File -
An Invited Lecture for the University of Strathclyde and Primary Engineer: Pre-Service Teachers perceptions of learning and teaching STEM
IRVING-BELL, D. (Invited speaker)
5 Jan 2021Activity: Dissemination › Invited talk
-
An Invited Lecture for the University of Strathclyde and Primary Engineer: Pre-Service Teachers perceptions of STEM Education
IRVING-BELL, D. (Invited speaker)
8 Jun 2020Activity: Dissemination › Invited talk
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver