Re-designing Design and Technology Education: A living literature review of stakeholder perspectives

DAWNE IRVING-BELL, DAVID WOOFF, Matt McLain

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding (ISBN)

337 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Created following the amalgamation of several individual subject disciplines, in England, design and technology is in decline. Debates about its purpose and position have taken place since its inception but arguably these have not transferred into a rigorous research base. There is a growing body of scholars exploring the field, but with the decline of the subject, so the community working and investigating it is also diminished. Without a strong foundation, the actions of the few may not carry sufficient weight to generate full and meaningful debate that would influence those with the power to change policy on curriculum and lead to innovation.

If we are to have any hope of reversing the subject’s deterioration, we must do something bold and significant. While an awareness of the subject’s history and its evolution is integral to our understanding of how and why we are where we are, merely reflecting on the past will do little to help the subject move forward. Hence, the principal aim of our research is to explore what a re-designed design and technology could look like. To achieve this, this study draws on different stakeholders’ visions of how they perceive the subject’s future.

Theoretical underpinning of this work is derived from abductive grounded theory, which aligns with the researcher’s individual ontological positions. Drawing together the findings from participants, this paper presents outcomes in the form of a ‘living document’. We see this as the first phase in an ongoing study into the future of the subject. Findings indicate a diverse range of opinion relating to the subject’s future. Following analysis, outcomes are discussed, and future steps to re-imagine the subject are then explored.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings PATT37: Developing a knowledge economy through technology and engineering education
Subtitle of host publicationDepartment of Technology and Entrepreneurship Education
EditorsSarah Pule, Marc de Vries
Place of PublicationUniversity of Malta, Msida, Malta
PublisherUniversity of Malta
Pages233-249
Number of pages16
ISBN (Print)9 789995 714796
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jun 2019
EventPATT37 : Developing a knowledge economy through technology and engineering education - University of Malta, Msida, Malta
Duration: 3 Jun 20196 Jun 2019
https://www.um.edu.mt/events/patt2019

Conference

ConferencePATT37
CountryMalta
CityMsida
Period3/06/196/06/19
Internet address

Fingerprint

stakeholder
education
literature
grounded theory
innovation
curriculum
history
community

Keywords

  • Curriculum change
  • Curriculum design
  • Curriculum innovation
  • Design and Technology
  • Living Document
  • STEM

Cite this

IRVING-BELL, DAWNE., WOOFF, DAVID., & McLain, M. (2019). Re-designing Design and Technology Education: A living literature review of stakeholder perspectives. In S. Pule, & M. de Vries (Eds.), Proceedings PATT37: Developing a knowledge economy through technology and engineering education: Department of Technology and Entrepreneurship Education (pp. 233-249). University of Malta, Msida, Malta: University of Malta.
IRVING-BELL, DAWNE ; WOOFF, DAVID ; McLain, Matt. / Re-designing Design and Technology Education: A living literature review of stakeholder perspectives. Proceedings PATT37: Developing a knowledge economy through technology and engineering education: Department of Technology and Entrepreneurship Education. editor / Sarah Pule ; Marc de Vries. University of Malta, Msida, Malta : University of Malta, 2019. pp. 233-249
@inproceedings{3dfeecc949274d3396385c2c5ac31076,
title = "Re-designing Design and Technology Education: A living literature review of stakeholder perspectives",
abstract = "Created following the amalgamation of several individual subject disciplines, in England, design and technology is in decline. Debates about its purpose and position have taken place since its inception but arguably these have not transferred into a rigorous research base. There is a growing body of scholars exploring the field, but with the decline of the subject, so the community working and investigating it is also diminished. Without a strong foundation, the actions of the few may not carry sufficient weight to generate full and meaningful debate that would influence those with the power to change policy on curriculum and lead to innovation.If we are to have any hope of reversing the subject’s deterioration, we must do something bold and significant. While an awareness of the subject’s history and its evolution is integral to our understanding of how and why we are where we are, merely reflecting on the past will do little to help the subject move forward. Hence, the principal aim of our research is to explore what a re-designed design and technology could look like. To achieve this, this study draws on different stakeholders’ visions of how they perceive the subject’s future.Theoretical underpinning of this work is derived from abductive grounded theory, which aligns with the researcher’s individual ontological positions. Drawing together the findings from participants, this paper presents outcomes in the form of a ‘living document’. We see this as the first phase in an ongoing study into the future of the subject. Findings indicate a diverse range of opinion relating to the subject’s future. Following analysis, outcomes are discussed, and future steps to re-imagine the subject are then explored.",
keywords = "Curriculum change, Curriculum design, Curriculum innovation, Design and Technology, Living Document, STEM",
author = "DAWNE IRVING-BELL and DAVID WOOFF and Matt McLain",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "3",
language = "English",
isbn = "9 789995 714796",
pages = "233--249",
editor = "Sarah Pule and {de Vries}, Marc",
booktitle = "Proceedings PATT37: Developing a knowledge economy through technology and engineering education",
publisher = "University of Malta",
address = "Malta",

}

IRVING-BELL, DAWNE, WOOFF, DAVID & McLain, M 2019, Re-designing Design and Technology Education: A living literature review of stakeholder perspectives. in S Pule & M de Vries (eds), Proceedings PATT37: Developing a knowledge economy through technology and engineering education: Department of Technology and Entrepreneurship Education. University of Malta, University of Malta, Msida, Malta, pp. 233-249, PATT37 , Msida, Malta, 3/06/19.

Re-designing Design and Technology Education: A living literature review of stakeholder perspectives. / IRVING-BELL, DAWNE; WOOFF, DAVID; McLain, Matt.

Proceedings PATT37: Developing a knowledge economy through technology and engineering education: Department of Technology and Entrepreneurship Education. ed. / Sarah Pule; Marc de Vries. University of Malta, Msida, Malta : University of Malta, 2019. p. 233-249.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding (ISBN)

TY - GEN

T1 - Re-designing Design and Technology Education: A living literature review of stakeholder perspectives

AU - IRVING-BELL, DAWNE

AU - WOOFF, DAVID

AU - McLain, Matt

PY - 2019/6/3

Y1 - 2019/6/3

N2 - Created following the amalgamation of several individual subject disciplines, in England, design and technology is in decline. Debates about its purpose and position have taken place since its inception but arguably these have not transferred into a rigorous research base. There is a growing body of scholars exploring the field, but with the decline of the subject, so the community working and investigating it is also diminished. Without a strong foundation, the actions of the few may not carry sufficient weight to generate full and meaningful debate that would influence those with the power to change policy on curriculum and lead to innovation.If we are to have any hope of reversing the subject’s deterioration, we must do something bold and significant. While an awareness of the subject’s history and its evolution is integral to our understanding of how and why we are where we are, merely reflecting on the past will do little to help the subject move forward. Hence, the principal aim of our research is to explore what a re-designed design and technology could look like. To achieve this, this study draws on different stakeholders’ visions of how they perceive the subject’s future.Theoretical underpinning of this work is derived from abductive grounded theory, which aligns with the researcher’s individual ontological positions. Drawing together the findings from participants, this paper presents outcomes in the form of a ‘living document’. We see this as the first phase in an ongoing study into the future of the subject. Findings indicate a diverse range of opinion relating to the subject’s future. Following analysis, outcomes are discussed, and future steps to re-imagine the subject are then explored.

AB - Created following the amalgamation of several individual subject disciplines, in England, design and technology is in decline. Debates about its purpose and position have taken place since its inception but arguably these have not transferred into a rigorous research base. There is a growing body of scholars exploring the field, but with the decline of the subject, so the community working and investigating it is also diminished. Without a strong foundation, the actions of the few may not carry sufficient weight to generate full and meaningful debate that would influence those with the power to change policy on curriculum and lead to innovation.If we are to have any hope of reversing the subject’s deterioration, we must do something bold and significant. While an awareness of the subject’s history and its evolution is integral to our understanding of how and why we are where we are, merely reflecting on the past will do little to help the subject move forward. Hence, the principal aim of our research is to explore what a re-designed design and technology could look like. To achieve this, this study draws on different stakeholders’ visions of how they perceive the subject’s future.Theoretical underpinning of this work is derived from abductive grounded theory, which aligns with the researcher’s individual ontological positions. Drawing together the findings from participants, this paper presents outcomes in the form of a ‘living document’. We see this as the first phase in an ongoing study into the future of the subject. Findings indicate a diverse range of opinion relating to the subject’s future. Following analysis, outcomes are discussed, and future steps to re-imagine the subject are then explored.

KW - Curriculum change

KW - Curriculum design

KW - Curriculum innovation

KW - Design and Technology

KW - Living Document

KW - STEM

M3 - Conference proceeding (ISBN)

SN - 9 789995 714796

SP - 233

EP - 249

BT - Proceedings PATT37: Developing a knowledge economy through technology and engineering education

A2 - Pule, Sarah

A2 - de Vries, Marc

PB - University of Malta

CY - University of Malta, Msida, Malta

ER -

IRVING-BELL DAWNE, WOOFF DAVID, McLain M. Re-designing Design and Technology Education: A living literature review of stakeholder perspectives. In Pule S, de Vries M, editors, Proceedings PATT37: Developing a knowledge economy through technology and engineering education: Department of Technology and Entrepreneurship Education. University of Malta, Msida, Malta: University of Malta. 2019. p. 233-249