Rarity and site selection for bryophyte conservation

Des A Callaghan, Paul A Ashton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sites that are particularly rich in rare species are of significant conservation value and there is consequently a need to ensure that they are highlighted by methods which aim to select sites for potential safeguarding. This study measures the value for rare bryophytes of 434 sites, located in South Lancashire, north-west England (UK). Using cluster analysis, these are split into three groups, representing high, moderate and low rarity value sites. Sub-sets of sites of equal total area were then created for hypothetical safeguarding using two of the many site selection methods in operation, one being a traditional criteria-based approach and the other a maximum-coverage algorithmic procedure. Both methods failed to choose all sites of high value for rare bryophytes, while the latter included substantially more smaller sites of moderate and low value. It seems that a threshold type criterion assessed against a composite and continuous measure of rarity has the potential to improve the selection of sites of substantive wildlife value. This is discussed in the context of the networks of Local Wildlife Sites and Sites of Special Scientific Interest in the UK.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1259-1272
JournalBiodiversity and Conservation
Volume18
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

bryophyte
rarity
site selection
wildlife
selection methods
Site of Special Scientific Interest
England
cluster analysis
rare species
methodology
method
Bryophyta

Cite this

@article{5ed1eeffe5324f908961e5f87d8462d0,
title = "Rarity and site selection for bryophyte conservation",
abstract = "Sites that are particularly rich in rare species are of significant conservation value and there is consequently a need to ensure that they are highlighted by methods which aim to select sites for potential safeguarding. This study measures the value for rare bryophytes of 434 sites, located in South Lancashire, north-west England (UK). Using cluster analysis, these are split into three groups, representing high, moderate and low rarity value sites. Sub-sets of sites of equal total area were then created for hypothetical safeguarding using two of the many site selection methods in operation, one being a traditional criteria-based approach and the other a maximum-coverage algorithmic procedure. Both methods failed to choose all sites of high value for rare bryophytes, while the latter included substantially more smaller sites of moderate and low value. It seems that a threshold type criterion assessed against a composite and continuous measure of rarity has the potential to improve the selection of sites of substantive wildlife value. This is discussed in the context of the networks of Local Wildlife Sites and Sites of Special Scientific Interest in the UK.",
author = "Callaghan, {Des A} and Ashton, {Paul A}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1007/s10531-008-9437-x",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "1259--1272",
journal = "Biodiversity and Conservation",
issn = "0960-3115",
publisher = "springer",
number = "5",

}

Rarity and site selection for bryophyte conservation. / Callaghan, Des A; Ashton, Paul A.

In: Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 18, No. 5, 2009, p. 1259-1272.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rarity and site selection for bryophyte conservation

AU - Callaghan, Des A

AU - Ashton, Paul A

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Sites that are particularly rich in rare species are of significant conservation value and there is consequently a need to ensure that they are highlighted by methods which aim to select sites for potential safeguarding. This study measures the value for rare bryophytes of 434 sites, located in South Lancashire, north-west England (UK). Using cluster analysis, these are split into three groups, representing high, moderate and low rarity value sites. Sub-sets of sites of equal total area were then created for hypothetical safeguarding using two of the many site selection methods in operation, one being a traditional criteria-based approach and the other a maximum-coverage algorithmic procedure. Both methods failed to choose all sites of high value for rare bryophytes, while the latter included substantially more smaller sites of moderate and low value. It seems that a threshold type criterion assessed against a composite and continuous measure of rarity has the potential to improve the selection of sites of substantive wildlife value. This is discussed in the context of the networks of Local Wildlife Sites and Sites of Special Scientific Interest in the UK.

AB - Sites that are particularly rich in rare species are of significant conservation value and there is consequently a need to ensure that they are highlighted by methods which aim to select sites for potential safeguarding. This study measures the value for rare bryophytes of 434 sites, located in South Lancashire, north-west England (UK). Using cluster analysis, these are split into three groups, representing high, moderate and low rarity value sites. Sub-sets of sites of equal total area were then created for hypothetical safeguarding using two of the many site selection methods in operation, one being a traditional criteria-based approach and the other a maximum-coverage algorithmic procedure. Both methods failed to choose all sites of high value for rare bryophytes, while the latter included substantially more smaller sites of moderate and low value. It seems that a threshold type criterion assessed against a composite and continuous measure of rarity has the potential to improve the selection of sites of substantive wildlife value. This is discussed in the context of the networks of Local Wildlife Sites and Sites of Special Scientific Interest in the UK.

U2 - 10.1007/s10531-008-9437-x

DO - 10.1007/s10531-008-9437-x

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 1259

EP - 1272

JO - Biodiversity and Conservation

JF - Biodiversity and Conservation

SN - 0960-3115

IS - 5

ER -