TY - JOUR
T1 - Radiotherapy versus open surgery versus
endolaryngeal surgery (with or without
laser) for early laryngeal squamous cell
cancer.
AU - Warner, Laura
AU - Chudasama, Jessal
AU - Kelly, Charles G Kelly
AU - Loughran, Sean
AU - McKenzie, Kenneth
AU - Wright, Richard
AU - Dey, Paola
PY - 2014/12/12
Y1 - 2014/12/12
N2 - BACKGROUND:
This is an update of a Cochrane review
first published in The Cochrane Library in
Issue 2, 2002 and previously updated in
2004, 2007 and 2010.Radiotherapy, open
surgery and endolaryngeal excision (with
or without laser) are all accepted
modalities of treatment for early-stage
glottic cancer. Case series suggest that
they confer a similar survival advantage,
however radiotherapy and endolaryngeal
surgery offer the advantage of voice
preservation. There has been an observed
trend away from open surgery in recent
years, however equipoise remains
between radiotherapy and endolaryngeal
surgery as both treatment modalities offer
laryngeal preservation with similar
survival rates. Opinions on optimal therapy
vary across disciplines and between
countries.
OBJECTIVES:
To compare the effectiveness of open
surgery, endolaryngeal excision (with or
without laser) and radiotherapy in the
management of early glottic laryngeal
cancer.
SEARCH METHODS:
We searched the Cochrane Ear, Nose and
Throat Disorders Group Trials Register;
the Cochrane Central Register of
Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2014, Issue
8); PubMed; EMBASE; CINAHL; Web of
Science; Cambridge Scientific Abstracts;
ICTRP and additional sources for published
and unpublished trials. The date of the
most recent search was 18 September
2014.
SELECTION CRITERIA:
Randomised controlled trials comparing
open surgery, endolaryngeal resection
(with or without laser) and radiotherapy.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:
We used the standard methodological
procedures expected by The Cochrane
Collaboration.
MAIN RESULTS:
We identified only one randomised
3 / 7
controlled trial, which compared open
surgery and radiotherapy in 234 patients
with early glottic laryngeal cancer. The
overall risk of bias in this study was
high.For T1 tumours, the five-year survival
was 91.7% following radiotherapy and
100% following surgery and for T2
tumours, 88.8% following radiotherapy
and 97.4% following surgery. There were
no significant differences in survival
between the two groups.For T1 tumours,
the five-year disease-free survival rate
was 71.1% following radiotherapy and
100.0% following surgery, and for the T2
tumours, 60.1% following radiotherapy
and 78.7% following surgery. Only the
latter comparison was statistically
significant (P value = 0.036), but statistical
significance would not have been achieved
with a two-sided test.Data were not
available on side effects, quality of life,
voice outcomes or cost.We identified no
randomised controlled trials that included
endolaryngeal surgery. A number of trials
comparing endolaryngeal resection and
radiotherapy have terminated early
because of difficulty recruiting participants.
One randomised controlled trial is still
ongoing.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS:
There is only one randomised controlled
trial comparing open surgery and
radiotherapy but its interpretation is
limited because of concerns about the
adequacy of treatment regimens and
deficiencies in the reporting of the study
design and analysis.
AB - BACKGROUND:
This is an update of a Cochrane review
first published in The Cochrane Library in
Issue 2, 2002 and previously updated in
2004, 2007 and 2010.Radiotherapy, open
surgery and endolaryngeal excision (with
or without laser) are all accepted
modalities of treatment for early-stage
glottic cancer. Case series suggest that
they confer a similar survival advantage,
however radiotherapy and endolaryngeal
surgery offer the advantage of voice
preservation. There has been an observed
trend away from open surgery in recent
years, however equipoise remains
between radiotherapy and endolaryngeal
surgery as both treatment modalities offer
laryngeal preservation with similar
survival rates. Opinions on optimal therapy
vary across disciplines and between
countries.
OBJECTIVES:
To compare the effectiveness of open
surgery, endolaryngeal excision (with or
without laser) and radiotherapy in the
management of early glottic laryngeal
cancer.
SEARCH METHODS:
We searched the Cochrane Ear, Nose and
Throat Disorders Group Trials Register;
the Cochrane Central Register of
Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2014, Issue
8); PubMed; EMBASE; CINAHL; Web of
Science; Cambridge Scientific Abstracts;
ICTRP and additional sources for published
and unpublished trials. The date of the
most recent search was 18 September
2014.
SELECTION CRITERIA:
Randomised controlled trials comparing
open surgery, endolaryngeal resection
(with or without laser) and radiotherapy.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:
We used the standard methodological
procedures expected by The Cochrane
Collaboration.
MAIN RESULTS:
We identified only one randomised
3 / 7
controlled trial, which compared open
surgery and radiotherapy in 234 patients
with early glottic laryngeal cancer. The
overall risk of bias in this study was
high.For T1 tumours, the five-year survival
was 91.7% following radiotherapy and
100% following surgery and for T2
tumours, 88.8% following radiotherapy
and 97.4% following surgery. There were
no significant differences in survival
between the two groups.For T1 tumours,
the five-year disease-free survival rate
was 71.1% following radiotherapy and
100.0% following surgery, and for the T2
tumours, 60.1% following radiotherapy
and 78.7% following surgery. Only the
latter comparison was statistically
significant (P value = 0.036), but statistical
significance would not have been achieved
with a two-sided test.Data were not
available on side effects, quality of life,
voice outcomes or cost.We identified no
randomised controlled trials that included
endolaryngeal surgery. A number of trials
comparing endolaryngeal resection and
radiotherapy have terminated early
because of difficulty recruiting participants.
One randomised controlled trial is still
ongoing.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS:
There is only one randomised controlled
trial comparing open surgery and
radiotherapy but its interpretation is
limited because of concerns about the
adequacy of treatment regimens and
deficiencies in the reporting of the study
design and analysis.
U2 - 10.1002/14651858.CD002027
DO - 10.1002/14651858.CD002027
M3 - Article (journal)
SN - 1469-493X
VL - 12
SP - CD002027
JO - Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
JF - Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
IS - 12
ER -