Quantifying the Physical Demands of Small Sided Games in Rugby Union: Contact vs. Non-contact

Lydia Chadwick, RICHARD PAGE, BEN LANGLEY

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the physical demands of contact small sided game (CSSG), non-contact small sided game (NCSSG) and match play, in female rugby union. Fifteen female rugby union players participated within this study. Participants completed two testing sessions. Session one involved two 20-minute small sided games (contact and non-contact). Session two involved a competitive rugby union game. Movement characteristics, heart rate, PlayerLoadTM and tackles were recorded using GPS units and heart rate monitors. No significant differences were identified between conditions in relation to average heart rate or time spent in different heart rate zones. Significant differences were identified between conditions for distance, normalised PlayerLoadTM and tackles. Distance covered was significantly higher in the non-contact small sided game, while normalised PlayerLoadTM and tackles were significantly lower in this condition. These findings suggest that the physiological stress, in terms of heart rate, is comparable between the match and both small sided games. Thus both small sided games seem to elicit an appropriate internal training response. However, the reductions in tackles and normalised PlayerLoadTM in the non-contact small sided game are likely to reduce injury risk, while the increase in distance covered may enhance the training stimuli provided in this condition.
Original languageEnglish
JournalCentral European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 27 May 2019

Fingerprint

heart rate
monitoring
testing

Keywords

  • GPS
  • Rugby
  • Time Motion Analysis
  • Small Sided Game
  • Physical Fitness

Cite this

@article{e29663ab0e224f05b86494e74a02f211,
title = "Quantifying the Physical Demands of Small Sided Games in Rugby Union: Contact vs. Non-contact",
abstract = "This study aimed to compare the physical demands of contact small sided game (CSSG), non-contact small sided game (NCSSG) and match play, in female rugby union. Fifteen female rugby union players participated within this study. Participants completed two testing sessions. Session one involved two 20-minute small sided games (contact and non-contact). Session two involved a competitive rugby union game. Movement characteristics, heart rate, PlayerLoadTM and tackles were recorded using GPS units and heart rate monitors. No significant differences were identified between conditions in relation to average heart rate or time spent in different heart rate zones. Significant differences were identified between conditions for distance, normalised PlayerLoadTM and tackles. Distance covered was significantly higher in the non-contact small sided game, while normalised PlayerLoadTM and tackles were significantly lower in this condition. These findings suggest that the physiological stress, in terms of heart rate, is comparable between the match and both small sided games. Thus both small sided games seem to elicit an appropriate internal training response. However, the reductions in tackles and normalised PlayerLoadTM in the non-contact small sided game are likely to reduce injury risk, while the increase in distance covered may enhance the training stimuli provided in this condition.",
keywords = "GPS, Rugby, Time Motion Analysis, Small Sided Game, Physical Fitness",
author = "Lydia Chadwick and RICHARD PAGE and BEN LANGLEY",
note = "open access",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "27",
language = "English",
journal = "Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine",
issn = "2300-9705",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantifying the Physical Demands of Small Sided Games in Rugby Union: Contact vs. Non-contact

AU - Chadwick, Lydia

AU - PAGE, RICHARD

AU - LANGLEY, BEN

N1 - open access

PY - 2019/5/27

Y1 - 2019/5/27

N2 - This study aimed to compare the physical demands of contact small sided game (CSSG), non-contact small sided game (NCSSG) and match play, in female rugby union. Fifteen female rugby union players participated within this study. Participants completed two testing sessions. Session one involved two 20-minute small sided games (contact and non-contact). Session two involved a competitive rugby union game. Movement characteristics, heart rate, PlayerLoadTM and tackles were recorded using GPS units and heart rate monitors. No significant differences were identified between conditions in relation to average heart rate or time spent in different heart rate zones. Significant differences were identified between conditions for distance, normalised PlayerLoadTM and tackles. Distance covered was significantly higher in the non-contact small sided game, while normalised PlayerLoadTM and tackles were significantly lower in this condition. These findings suggest that the physiological stress, in terms of heart rate, is comparable between the match and both small sided games. Thus both small sided games seem to elicit an appropriate internal training response. However, the reductions in tackles and normalised PlayerLoadTM in the non-contact small sided game are likely to reduce injury risk, while the increase in distance covered may enhance the training stimuli provided in this condition.

AB - This study aimed to compare the physical demands of contact small sided game (CSSG), non-contact small sided game (NCSSG) and match play, in female rugby union. Fifteen female rugby union players participated within this study. Participants completed two testing sessions. Session one involved two 20-minute small sided games (contact and non-contact). Session two involved a competitive rugby union game. Movement characteristics, heart rate, PlayerLoadTM and tackles were recorded using GPS units and heart rate monitors. No significant differences were identified between conditions in relation to average heart rate or time spent in different heart rate zones. Significant differences were identified between conditions for distance, normalised PlayerLoadTM and tackles. Distance covered was significantly higher in the non-contact small sided game, while normalised PlayerLoadTM and tackles were significantly lower in this condition. These findings suggest that the physiological stress, in terms of heart rate, is comparable between the match and both small sided games. Thus both small sided games seem to elicit an appropriate internal training response. However, the reductions in tackles and normalised PlayerLoadTM in the non-contact small sided game are likely to reduce injury risk, while the increase in distance covered may enhance the training stimuli provided in this condition.

KW - GPS

KW - Rugby

KW - Time Motion Analysis

KW - Small Sided Game

KW - Physical Fitness

M3 - Article

JO - Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine

JF - Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine

SN - 2300-9705

ER -