TY - JOUR
T1 - Pyrocarbon metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty in noninflammatory arthritis
T2 - Minimum 5-year follow-Up
AU - Dickson, David R.
AU - Badge, Ravi
AU - Nuttall, David
AU - Watts, Adam C.
AU - Talwalkar, Sumedh C.
AU - Hayton, Mike
AU - Trail, Ian A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American Society for Surgery of the Hand.
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/10/1
Y1 - 2015/10/1
N2 - Purpose To report the outcomes, complications, and survivorship of pyrocarbon metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty in noninflammatory arthropathy at a minimum 5-year follow-up. Methods A retrospective review of 51 implants in 36 patients was undertaken. Patient demographics, complications, further surgery, and implant revision were recorded. Objective outcome was assessed by grip strength, range of motion, and radiological assessment of alignment, loosening, and subsidence. Subjective outcome was assessed by Patient Evaluation Measure, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and visual analog scores (0, best; 10, worst) for appearance, satisfaction, and pain. Results There were 35 index and 16 middle fingers. The average follow-up was 103 months (range, 60-172 months). The mean arc of motion was 54° (range, 20° to 80°). There was no difference in grip strength between operated and nonsurgical side. Six implants were revised, and 3 of these required additional surgery. The average Patient Evaluation Measure and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores were 27 (range, 10-54) and 29 (range, 0-57), respectively. Mean visual analog scores for pain, satisfaction, and appearance were all 1 with the respective ranges being 0-7, 0-4, and 0-6. Most implants were Herren grade 1 lucency with the remaining 5 proximal and 12 distal implants being grade 2. Mean subsidence in the proximal component was 2 mm (range, 0-4 mm) and 1 mm (range, 0-3 mm) in the distal component. The degree of loosening or subsidence did not correlate with outcome. Implant survival as assessed by Kaplan-Meier was 88% at 10 years. Conclusions Good pain relief, a functional range of motion, and high satisfaction were seen in the majority of patients. All implant revisions were performed within 18 months of the index procedure. This may represent technical issues rather than problems with the implant. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic IV.
AB - Purpose To report the outcomes, complications, and survivorship of pyrocarbon metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty in noninflammatory arthropathy at a minimum 5-year follow-up. Methods A retrospective review of 51 implants in 36 patients was undertaken. Patient demographics, complications, further surgery, and implant revision were recorded. Objective outcome was assessed by grip strength, range of motion, and radiological assessment of alignment, loosening, and subsidence. Subjective outcome was assessed by Patient Evaluation Measure, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and visual analog scores (0, best; 10, worst) for appearance, satisfaction, and pain. Results There were 35 index and 16 middle fingers. The average follow-up was 103 months (range, 60-172 months). The mean arc of motion was 54° (range, 20° to 80°). There was no difference in grip strength between operated and nonsurgical side. Six implants were revised, and 3 of these required additional surgery. The average Patient Evaluation Measure and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores were 27 (range, 10-54) and 29 (range, 0-57), respectively. Mean visual analog scores for pain, satisfaction, and appearance were all 1 with the respective ranges being 0-7, 0-4, and 0-6. Most implants were Herren grade 1 lucency with the remaining 5 proximal and 12 distal implants being grade 2. Mean subsidence in the proximal component was 2 mm (range, 0-4 mm) and 1 mm (range, 0-3 mm) in the distal component. The degree of loosening or subsidence did not correlate with outcome. Implant survival as assessed by Kaplan-Meier was 88% at 10 years. Conclusions Good pain relief, a functional range of motion, and high satisfaction were seen in the majority of patients. All implant revisions were performed within 18 months of the index procedure. This may represent technical issues rather than problems with the implant. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic IV.
KW - arthroplasty
KW - metacarpophalangeal joint
KW - outcome
KW - Pyrocarbon
KW - survivorship
KW - Confidence Intervals
KW - Follow-Up Studies
KW - Humans
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Male
KW - Prosthesis Design
KW - Prosthesis Failure
KW - Time Factors
KW - Metacarpophalangeal Joint/diagnostic imaging
KW - Adult
KW - Female
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Hand Strength
KW - Range of Motion, Articular/physiology
KW - Osteoarthritis/pathology
KW - Kaplan-Meier Estimate
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Carbon
KW - Radiography
KW - Arthroplasty, Replacement, Finger/adverse effects
KW - Joint Prosthesis
KW - Aged
KW - Reoperation/methods
KW - Cohort Studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942199609&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942199609&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/4b94c7c7-4893-312f-8f28-af74108fe244/
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.06.104
DO - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.06.104
M3 - Article (journal)
C2 - 26281977
AN - SCOPUS:84942199609
SN - 0363-5023
VL - 40
SP - 1956
EP - 1962
JO - Journal of Hand Surgery
JF - Journal of Hand Surgery
IS - 10
ER -