Research output per year
Research output per year
Abstract
This paper examines one component of
Stephen Mumford’s case for the claim that
we should regard sport, art and the
aesthetic as more closely connected than
has tended to be the case, under the
influence of the work of David Best, in
recent years. Mumford’s rejection of what
I call ‘the drama argument’ is examined in
detail and it is argued that all but one
element of his case fails to do the job he
envisages.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-14 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Journal of the Philosophy of Sport |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 8 Mar 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 31 Mar 2017 |
Keywords
- aesthetics of sport
- David Best
- drama
- purist and partisan
- Stephen Mumford
- theaesthetic
- the drama argument.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Purism and the Category of ‘the Aesthetic’: The Drama Argument'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 3 Citations
- 2 Article (journal)
-
Meaning and Use: Drama and the Aesthetic
CULBERTSON, L., 14 May 2020, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Sport, Ethics and Philosophy. p. 1-22 22 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (journal) › peer-review
Open AccessFile1 Citation (Scopus)129 Downloads (Pure) -
Scylla and Charybdis: the Purist's Dilemma
CULBERTSON, L., 2 May 2016, In: Sport, Ethics and Philosophy. 10, 2, p. 175-196 22 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (journal) › peer-review
Open AccessFile4 Citations (Scopus)145 Downloads (Pure)
